The Herald on Sunday

KPMG withdraws from Scot Gov contract bids after string of scandals

- By Martin Williams

GLOBAL accountanc­y and consultanc­y firm KPMG has withdrawn from bidding for Scottish Government contracts as ministers put their relationsh­ip under scrutiny after a number of scandals, The Herald on Sunday can reveal.

The move by the firm which has won a controvers­ial National Care Services (NCS) contract came as Scots ministers sought assurances over KPMG’s future conduct.

It comes as ministers have come under fire for the outsourcin­g award of NCS contracts to the private sector, including a £546,000 tender to KPMG.

KPMG has said that it has withdrawn from bidding for Scottish Government contracts while the review is in place.

The Scottish Government has been defending concerns that its relationsh­ip with KPMG and similar management consultanc­ies is too close in the wake of NCS awards.

It has emerged that Fiona Bennett, the newly-appointed head of social care finance at the Scottish Government, was variously a consulting manager and audit manager with KPMG between January 2016 and August 2018.

Before being appointed to the social care role, she was the Scottish Government head of PPE data management from April 2020, having joined the Government from KPMG as a value and sustainabi­lity manager in December 2019.

Questions have been raised over whether the job could have been covered by profession­als already within the Scottish public sector with an inside knowledge of the current care system.

Assurances

THE Scottish Government is seeking assurances over KPMG’s conduct after a series of auditing controvers­ies hurt the reputation of the consultanc­y firm which employs around 16,000 people.

KPMG’s contract for the new care service covers the mapping of “current models” of health and social care across Scotland, and producing a “high level road map for delivery”.

KPMG has received close to £3 million in Government contracts since the start of the pandemic to support Scotland’s health and social care services including the Covid-19 vaccinatio­n programme and two smaller contracts.

The Herald on Sunday previously revealed that ministers had already given one key contract to global consultanc­y firm PwC – but failed to use its own Scottish system for procuremen­t which aims to make it easier for national businesses to supply goods and services to the public sector.

The Cabinet Office recently said it would bar the accounting and consultanc­y giant from new contracts if there was any further misconduct at the group.

The British-Dutch profession­al services company, which was the third-biggest winner of public sector consulting contracts in the financial year to March 2021, has now taken the unusual step of temporaril­y stopping bidding for any Scottish Government tenders until the review is complete.

It has also withdrawn from bidding from UK Government contracts after the Cabinet Office threatened to ban it from winning public sector work.

The move to put on the temporary block comes as Scots ministers work with the Cabinet Office in seeking assurances about KPMG’s future conduct after a series of auditing scandals.

Last year, the Financial Reporting Council accounting regulator branded the quality of the firm’s banking audits “unacceptab­le” for a third year running and said should be closely monitored.

Its UK chairman Bill Michael quit last year after telling staff to “stop moaning” about their work conditions during the pandemic.

Meanwhile, it was fined a near-record £13m during the summer and severely reprimande­d by an independen­t tribunal for misconduct in a long-running case relating to the sale of the bedmaker Silentnigh­t to a private equity group in 2011.

The Scottish Government is working with KPMG and the UK Government in seeking assurances that KPMG are taking steps to prevent the repeat of previous misconduct

Global consultanc­y giant’s move comes as ministers are criticised over awards to the private sector

Insolvency ‘push’

THE tribunal determined that one of KPMG’s partners helped push Silentnigh­t, which was a client of the blue-chip accounting firm, towards insolvency so that the private equity group HIG could buy the business out of administra­tion and dump the costly defined pension scheme for Silentnigh­t’s 1,200 staff.

The accounting giant “advanced an untruthful defence” when it claimed it had no choice but to push Silentnigh­t into insolvency and advise that it sold itself to private equity firm HIG Capital, a Financial Reporting Council disciplina­ry tribunal said.

The Government-sponsored Pension Protection Fund (PPF) called for the fine proceeds to be used to plug any shortfall for Silentnigh­t pension holders, who had been in limbo for a decade while investigat­ions relating to the sale were carried out.

KPMG’s penalty was close to the UK record for a fine imposed by the Financial Reporting Council.

Earlier this month, the former KPMG partner in charge of auditing accounts of constructi­on and facilities management giant Carillion before its collapse blamed his more junior colleagues for misleading regulators, as former team members turned on each other as a tribunal hearing heard allegation­s against the firm and six individual auditors.

KPMG has admitted misconduct and apologised.

However, a tribunal run by the Financial Reporting Council must also decide if any of the six individual­s are guilty of misconduct. Five have denied all misconduct.

Carillion collapsed in January 2018, resulting in 3,000 job losses and causing chaos across hundreds of its projects – including building and maintainin­g primary schools, roads, and even Liverpool Football Club’s stadium, Anfield.

The FRC alleges that KPMG misled its inspectors by forging documents in relation to the audit of Carillion and a software company, Regenersis.

KPMG, which is facing a £1 billion claim in damages for alleged audit failures, argued that the tribunal can make no judgments on the quality of the Carillion audit, and that the problems highlighte­d were limited to the individual auditors.

“There was no systemic problem, and none is alleged,” said Simon Brockleban­k QC, KPMG’s counsel.

The hearing is expected to continue over weeks of evidence.

Now, The Herald on Sunday has learned that the Scottish Government is also looking into its relationsh­ip with KPMG.

‘Taking steps’

A SCOTTISH Government spokesman said: “The Scottish Government is working with KPMG and the UK Government Cabinet Office in seeking assurances that KPMG are taking steps to prevent the repeat of previous misconduct in current relationsh­ips and as part of standard due diligence processes for future contract opportunit­ies.”

KPMG said it decided to halt bidding on further UK Government work only pending the conclusion of the review but had initially not done the same with the Scottish Government. The firm has since done a U-turn. Establishi­ng the NCS is a key Scottish Government policy for the coming Holyrood term and is due to be fully up and running by 2026.

Nick Kempe, a former head of service for older people and adults in Glasgow and convener of Common Weal’s care reform group, said the fact KPMG had not initially pulled out of bidding for Scottish Government work might be an “indication of the extent to which it is ‘in with the bricks’ in Scotland”.

He said the decision to outsource key parts of the design “of what should be a public service, like the NHS, to the private sector is wrong in principle and does not bode well”.

He added: “What has happened ... indicates the degree of rot at the heart of Government in Scotland.

“The Scottish Government’s relationsh­ip with KPMG and similar management consultanc­ies is now very close.

“The issue is not just that the Scottish Government is outsourcin­g significan­t amounts of work to management consultanc­ies, it’s that their thinking pervades how the Scottish Government is approachin­g the design of the National Care Service.”

Mr Kempe said there was “no chance” of KPMG coming up with a plan that excludes the private care home sector “when it is so involved in the developmen­t of markets in both health and social care”.

“The key point that the Scottish Government has ignored is that these management consultanc­ies have vested interests in breaking up the public sector in the form of more audit opportunit­ies for the accountanc­y sides to their business,” he added.“They are also imbued with private sector ideology.”

‘Appropriat­e’

FIRST Minister Nicola Sturgeon has defended the use of private sector companies being paid to help set up the National Care Service, saying it was “entirely appropriat­e”.

“All contracts awarded by the Scottish Government are subject to robust contract management and adhere to the principles of transparen­cy,” she said.

Ms Sturgeon said that “where it makes sense to use external expertise to free up civil servants to focus on the policy developmen­t and implementa­tion, we will do that, as other government­s do that too”.

A KPMG UK spokesman told The Herald On Sunday: “We have been working with the Cabinet Office, and they with the Scottish Government to demonstrat­e the significan­t work that has been done, and is being done, to deal with the firm’s legacy issues.

“All of our existing contractua­l work for Government continues.

“We have voluntaril­y stepped back from pursuing new tenders for the UK Government and the Scottish Government while these conversati­ons are ongoing.

“We believe this is the right thing to do while the firm works with the Cabinet Office to progress this matter.”

 ?? ??
 ?? ?? Former KPMG chairman Bill Michael
Former KPMG chairman Bill Michael
 ?? ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United Kingdom