The Herald on Sunday

‘Catastroph­e’ fears Fresh ferry concerns as CMAL now indicates it may not take delivery

It has emerged that ship procurers won’t accept Glen Rosa and Glen Sannox unless their green dual-fuel systems are operationa­l

- By Martin Williams

NEW concerns have surfaced over the delivery of Scotland’s ferries after the Scottish Government’s ferry owner and procurer indicated it will not accept delivery if they are not fully dual fuel.

It comes as it emerged there have been questions from within nationalis­ed Ferguson Marine about whether issues regarding the use of liquefied natural gas (LNG) could be a risk to the project.

The two lifeline ferries, Glen Sannox and Glen Rosa, were to be able to operate on LNG which the ferry owner and procurer Caledonian Maritime Assets Ltd (CMAL) said was “significan­tly cleaner and will help to reduce emissions to meet ambitious Scottish Government targets”.

Both ships were lauded by then-First Minister Nicola Sturgeon as the “sustainabl­e” ferries that would “contribute to Scotland’s world-leading climate change goals”.

CMAL has previously said that the two vessels would reduce the carbon footprint of the ferry fleet by 25 %.

After a series of issues with the “green” fuel, Ferguson Marine’s chief executive David Tydeman said in his latest update that while steady progress is being made with the LNG system “we still have some risks associated with the final installati­on of the special, low-temperatur­e pipework by the contractor”.

It has emerged that CMAL has said that it won’t take delivery unless the LNG system is working.

‘Only’ dual fuel

IN a record of a CMAL June board meeting, CMAL’s chief executive Kevin Hobbs said “we have made it clear that the MVGS (Glen Sannox) should only be handed over with all systems fully commission­ed” (so fully dual fuel).

He also raised concerns about “the lack of engagement and understand­ing regarding sea trials of the vessels whereby CFL (CalMac Ferries Ltd) are simply observers”.

The account of a Ferguson Marine board meeting from May shows that non-executive director Stuart Smith asked if the LNG system was a “risk to the programme”.

Ship delivery director Andy Crossan said that at that point the firm did not have approval on the LNG system and was “working with contractor­s to de-risk”.

A Ferguson Marine spokesman said that despite past issues “there will be no gap in terms of LNG” and that when the vessels finally set sail it will be available for use from day one.

In November last year, Ferguson Marine said the first of the two vessels would need to use diesel for the first nine months of its service rather than LNG.

That was because the shipyard had not managed to procure sensors which the ship needed to run the LNG system.

During the summer, in a progress check, Mr Tydeman said the LNG system could only be proven “once we have agreed where the very low temperatur­e (-170C) LNG can be safely loaded on to the ship and once the integrity of machinery has been first proven with the MGO fuel”.

He said: “We expect decisions to be made during the next three months and this highlights that Glen Sannox will be the first ship to be built and commission­ed in the UK with LNG and there could be unforeseen issues during the final commission­ing processes.”

One ferry user group official said there would be fears at the very least of further delay if Ferguson Marine was forced to keep the ships back until their LNG capability is resolved.

“LNG has been one of the many pains in the side of the efforts to produce these ferries from the start,” he said. “It would be a real catastroph­e if the attempt to be green further damages the efforts to finally get these ferries sailing for the benefit of islanders who just want a reliable service.”

On Friday, ministers came under fire as new estimates suggested the cost of building Scotland’s ferry vessels could reach £400 million.

The sum, which does not include the millions pumped into nationalis­ed Ferguson Marine to keep it operating, amounts to over four times the £97m contract cost for the two lifeline ferries still awaiting delivery in the Inverclyde shipyard.

Extra £240m

FERGUSON Marine’s Mr Tydeman indicated it will cost an extra £240m to build Glen Sannox and Glen Rosa on top of what was spent before nationalis­ation.

Some £83.25m was spent on the ferries prior to the Scottish Government taking control of the shipyard firm with a further £45m loaned. In his latest update, Mr Tydeman says the contingenc­y costs for both vessels could increase the overall spend even further by £30m.

There is also a potential extra spend on warranties, many of which have expired.

Glen Sannox was due in March 2024 but there remain doubts over whether that schedule will be met with Mr Tydeman saying it will “depend on how well the trial progress”.

It is believed Glen Rosa is now not due to be completed until May 2025.

Questions had been raised about sanctionin­g the move to LNG after it was revealed work on crucial infrastruc­ture had not started yet, while one of two LNG tanks involved in a £5m contract are no longer needed.

Questions were also raised about how the ferries will be fuelled in the wake of LNG infrastruc­ture problems.

The latest completion date given by the Danish supplier is the “beginning of 2025” – well after the latest dates for the delivery to Scottish Government­controlled ferry operator CalMac of the

It would be a real catastroph­e if the attempt to be green further damages the efforts to finally get these ferries sailing for the benefit of islanders

much-delayed and over-budget vessels Glen Sannox and Glen Rosa.

Eyebrows have also been raised about the logistics of getting LNG to Scotland while four new vessels being built in Turkey will not be powered by the “green” fuel at all.

According to a 2022 Scottish Government briefing, LNG will have to be shipped from the Isle of Grain in Kent – a journey nearly 500 miles by road.

CalMac has been told that it is not yet feasible to use LNG-powered trucks due to the size of the fuel tanks required and a lack of refuelling infrastruc­ture.

While there has been criticism over what has been described by some as an LNG planning “farce”, CalMac has begun moves to use Troon rather than Ardrossan for services to and from Arran.

Because of the storage tank issues, the LNG will be pumped from trucks to the ship there.

Not sustainabl­e

CALMAC admits in its customer messaging that truck-to-ship bunkering is “not considered a sustainabl­e solution” which will meet the long-term demands of the new ships.

It says the typical transfer rate is too slow – typically between two and two-and-a-half hours for 20 tonnes.

When the delayed fixed tank is in operation, the time will drop to between 45 and 60 minutes.

The ferry operator said if tankers are required to meet the vessel during the timetabled port calls, there would be a “risk of delay caused if problems were encountere­d during transit”.

A Transport Scotland spokesman said: “Transport Scotland, the Scottish Government, CMAL and [Ferguson Marine] meet weekly to discuss the progress of MV Glen Sannox towards handover, including the LNG system requiremen­ts, and to ensure that the vessel is fully commission­ed when delivered.”

The Transport Scotland spokesman added: “The global LNG industry has an excellent safety record. Permanent use and storage of LNG in the UK is subject to control by the Control of Major Accident Hazards (COMAH) regulation­s and the IMO’s Internatio­nal Code of Safety for Ships (IGF Code).”

 ?? ??
 ?? ?? Ferguson Marine’s chief executive David Tydeman
Ferguson Marine’s chief executive David Tydeman
 ?? ?? Above, the Ferguson Marine shipyard in Inverclyde
Above, the Ferguson Marine shipyard in Inverclyde
 ?? ?? Left, the unfinished Glen Sannox
Left, the unfinished Glen Sannox

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United Kingdom