The Independent

Democrats rebut Trump FBI surveillan­ce claims

- EMILY SHUGERMAN IN NEW YORK

Democrats on the House Intelligen­ce Committee yesterday released a classified memo rebutting Republican­s’ claims that the FBI carried out improper surveillan­ce on the Trump campaign. The heavily redacted document claims the FBI did not rely on faulty evidence when securing a warrant to conduct surveillan­ce on the former Trump campaign aide Carter Page – an allegation Republican­s made in a memo the committee released last month.

Donald Trump blocked the release of the memo two weeks ago, citing security concerns. Democrats have since gone back and forth with the FBI over possible redactions, according to the New York Times.

Responding to the Democrats’ memo yesterday evening, Mr Trump said it was a “total political and legal BUST”. He added: “Just confirms all of the terrible things that were done. SO ILLEGAL!”

The version that the White House approved for release yesterday states that FBI and Department of Justice (DOJ) officials “did not ‘abuse’ the Foreign Intelligen­ce Surveillan­ce Act (FISA) process, omit material informatio­n or subvert this vital tool to spy on the Trump campaign”.

“In fact,” the memo continues, “DOJ and the FBI would have been remiss in their duty to protect the country had they not sought a FISA warrant and repeated renewals to conduct temporary surveillan­ce of Carter Page, someone the FBI assessed to be an agent of the Russia government.” Mr Page has denied any wrongdoing in his work for the Trump campaign.

The memo also rebuts claims that the FBI relied exclusivel­y on informatio­n in the so-called “Steele dossier” – an opposition research document funded by Mr Trump’s election rival – in launching its investigat­ion of the Trump campaign. The memo claims the FBI only received the Steele dossier in September of 2016 – seven weeks after the FBI started its Trump team investigat­ion.

Democrats on the committee also took issue with the inclusion of informatio­n about FBI agent Peter Strzok and attorney Lisa Page in the Republican memo. Mr Strzok worked on the FBI’s investigat­ion of the Trump campaign, and both he and Ms Page worked briefly on special counsel Robert Mueller’s investigat­ion.

Republican­s have made much of the fact that Mr Strzok and Ms Page exchanged pro-Clinton, anti-Trump sentiments via text message during their investigat­ions. The Democrats’ memo, however, says the informatio­n is irrelevant, as neither one worked directly on the FISA applicatio­n.

The White House said Mr Trump chose to release the memo in the interest of transparen­cy, but took issue with several of the Democrat’s points. “This politicall­y driven document fails to answer serious concerns raised by the Majority’s memorandum about the use of partisan opposition research from one candidate, loaded with uncorrobor­ated allegation­s, as a basis to ask a court to approve surveillan­ce of a former associate of another candidate, at the height of a presidenti­al campaign,” Press Secretary Sarah Huckabee Sanders said.

The release of the memo marks the latest salvo in a battle between Republican and Democrats on the Intelligen­ce Committee over what informatio­n should be released to the public. Republican­s said they wanted to release their memo to inform Americans of abuses by the FBI. Democrats claimed the memo was the GOP’s attempt to undermine ongoing FBI and DOJ investigat­ions of the Trump campaign.

Announcing the memo’s release yesterday, ranking Democrat Adam Schiff tweeted: “Some time ago, Republican­s on our committee released a declassifi­ed memo that omitted and distorted key facts in order to mislead the public and impugn the integrity of the FBI. We can now tell you what they left out.”

 ??  ?? Adam Schiff, Ranking Member on the House Intelligen­ce Committee, speaks with reporters on Capitol Hill yesterday (Getty)
Adam Schiff, Ranking Member on the House Intelligen­ce Committee, speaks with reporters on Capitol Hill yesterday (Getty)

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United Kingdom