The Independent

Hunt seeks joint task force to protect UK ships in Gulf

Foreign secretary accuses Iran of taking part in ‘state piracy’

- KIM SENGUPTA AND ANDREW WOODCOCK

The UK will seek to organise a European-led naval contingent for the Gulf to escort ships following an “act of state piracy” by Iran in seizing a British tanker.

Jeremy Hunt told the Commons that discussion­s have taken place with a number of allied states in the last 48 hours on the forming of a protection force with further talks to be held later this week.

The foreign secretary said: “It is with a heavy heart that we are announcing this increased internatio­nal

presence in the Gulf because the focus of our diplomacy has been on de-escalating tensions in the hope that such changes would not be necessary.” But, he said, Tehran had flagrantly flouted the law in capturing the Stena Impero in internatio­nal waters.

The move is certain to further escalate tensions between Britain and Iran which began when royal marines boarded an Iranian owned tanker, Grace 1, off the coast of Gibraltar for allegedly smuggling oil to the Assad regime in Syria in breach of European Union sanctions.

No EU state had seized a ship using force in seas over a sanctions breach before and Tehran accused London of acting on US instructio­ns.

But Jeremy Hunt told MPs that Iran “had no right to obstruct the ship’s passage, let alone board her” under internatio­nal law.

“It was therefore an act of state piracy. We will now seek to put together a European-led maritime protection mission to support safe passage of both crew and cargo in this vital region,” he said. “If Iran continues on this dangerous path, they must accept the price will be a larger western military presence in the waters along their coastline, not because we wish to increase tensions but simply because freedom of navigation is a principle which Britain and its allies will always defend,” he added.

Fabian Hamilton, the shadow minister for peace, warned of a “tit-for-tat cycle of actions”. The Labour minister questioned why a British-flagged tanker was “left so hopelessly unprotecte­d in the Strait of Hormuz” when anyone with any understand­ing of the issue could see that “this was exactly” how Iranians would respond following the seizure of one of their tankers. However, Mr Hamilton added: “Iran’s actions in recent weeks in the Strait of Hormuz have been utterly unacceptab­le and should be condemned from all sides.”

The UK Chamber of Shipping backed the foreign secretary with Bob Sanguinett­i, the chief executive officer, saying: “We welcome the announceme­nt of a joint European maritime mission to protect British and European interests in the Strait of Hormuz. While the European maritime mission is a step in the right direction, It is imperative that the UK government continues to protect the interests of British-flagged ships in the Gulf while the mission is assembled. This means formulatin­g a mechanism that will provide confidence and security to allow ships to pass through the straits safely and securely. We continue to work closely with government to achieve this.”

The foreign secretary’s announceme­nt came on a day in which Iran announced that it has arrested “17 spies” for working for the CIA, with some sentenced to death. The intelligen­ce ministry in Tehran claimed the suspects had been collecting informatio­n on nuclear, military and other sectors. Donald Trump said the allegation­s were “totally false”.

The Iranian authoritie­s also released images of crew members on board the Stena Impero showing Iranian officials talking to them and meals being prepared.

The majority of crew are Indian and the Iranian embassy in India said they were in good health and were being well looked after. The crew of the Iranian tanker being held in Gibraltar are also predominan­tly Indian. Delhi was one of the main purchasers of Iranian oil before the Trump administra­tion imposed new sanctions.

Some Iranian officials have been of the view that the UK may start to take a tougher line with Tehran, especially with the imminent expected arrival of Boris Johnson in Downing Street, and hawks in the US administra­tion may try to bring their influence to bear.

Despite his frequent tirades against Iran, President Trump aborted planned military strikes after attacks on two oil tankers in the Gulf earlier this year. He has also given Senator Rand Paul, who has been a steadfast opponent of America’s wars abroad from a right-wing libertaria­n stance, a role in negotiatin­g with Iran. The Kentucky senator is being viewed as a counterwei­ght to the president’s national security advisor, John Bolton, who has been a serial advocate military interventi­on and has, in the past, called for regime change in Tehran.

The Iranian foreign minister, Mohammad Javad Zarif, appeared to think there is a risk of a Boris Johnson government becoming susceptibl­e to pressure from the American hawks. He tweeted yesterday: “Having failed to lure @realDonald Trump into War of the Century, and fearing collapse of his #B Team, @AmbJohnBol­ton is turning his venom against the UK in hopes of dragging it into a quagmire. Only prudence and foresight can thwart such ploys.”

While the Trump administra­tion has tried to dismantle the Joint Comprehens­ive Plan of Action (JCPOA), reached between internatio­nal powers and Iran over its nuclear programme, the other signatorie­s – Britain, France, Germany, Russia and China – had sought to keep it going. The European states are seeking to set up a payment mechanism under which businesses can continue trading with Iran, circumvent­ing US sanctions.

Before Mr Hunt’s statement to the Commons, an Iranian official told The Independen­t: “We have complained that the others [nuclear deal signatorie­s] have not done enough to protect the JCPOA, but we accept that they, including the UK, see that it should be kept going. On the tankers we are unhappy with the UK about what happened in Gibraltar. But there was good dialogue. What we are worried about is whether this would change with Britain trying to show its loyalty to America,” the official added.

Earlier in the day in London, Theresa May chaired her last Cobra meeting and her spokespers­on rejected claims that it had rejected a US offer to escort British ships through the Gulf. A spokespers­on said: “There has never been a US offer that has involved them escorting all UK ships. The US has been discussing with a

number of countries, including the UK, how we might deliver maritime security in the face of recent threats to shipping.”

As for Washington, secretary of state Mike Pompeo said yesterday when asked about the tanker that “the responsibi­lity ... falls to the United Kingdom to take care of their ships”.

Downing Street also sought to refute charges that the royal navy had been so denuded by cuts in the 2010 Strategic Defence and Security Review that it had failed to protect UK vessels from Iranian gunboats. “We always said that we will ensure we have all the capability that we need in order to protect the UK and serve its interests. We have the largest military budget in Europe. We are investing in a world-class royal navy”, the spokespers­on said.

“The high volume of ships moving through the Strait of Hormuz – up to 30 ships covering more than 100 nautical miles – makes it impossible to escort vessels individual­ly. We already work closely with internatio­nal partners to ensure a co-ordinated effort to defend freedom of navigation, this includes sharing informatio­n on threats to shipping and offering mutual protection for each other’s vessels,” he added.

 ?? (Getty) ?? Increased internatio­nal presence required to support vessels, Hunt says
(Getty) Increased internatio­nal presence required to support vessels, Hunt says
 ?? (EPA) ?? Crew members of the British-flagged tanker ‘Stena Impero’ seen in an image released by Iranian state media
(EPA) Crew members of the British-flagged tanker ‘Stena Impero’ seen in an image released by Iranian state media

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United Kingdom