The Independent

I despair over how little has changed in the world since the moon landing

-

Saturday 20 July marked 50 years since the first man walked on the moon; I can vividly remember listening to the event on a crackling transistor radio on the bridge of a bulk-carrier, keeping watch as a young chief mate sailed along the US Eastern Seaboard. Just the day before while steaming past Martha’s Vineyard, the same little radio had relayed the minute-by-minute drama surroundin­g Senator Ted Kennedy driving his Oldsmobile off Chappaquid­dick Bridge, with all the gory details of American politics laid bare. The clarion call on 20 July 1969 was that it was the “Dawn Of A New Era”, and there certainly have been countless technologi­cal advances in just about every aspect of our lives since the moon landing. Yet there was turmoil back then with bad news coming from Vietnam every day, and the world in the grip of the Cold War.

Scanning Saturday’s headlines exactly a half-century later, makes one wonder just how much humanity has learned and changed in the intervenin­g years. The Persian Gulf is a powder keg ready to explode, adding to wars already raging in Yemen, Syria and other countries in the volatile region. There’s political unrest on several continents, and all the gory details of American politics are laid bare, once again. So much for the “Dawn Of A New Era”, eh?

Bernie Smith Parksville, BC, Canada

I don’t understand Boris

In every letter, newspaper report, television broadcast and documentar­y Boris Johnson is seen to be a liar, immoral, a cheat, scruffy, a prevaricat­or. As is obvious from the numbers of high ranking MPs who are resigning, he is definitely not someone who will unite the party or the country. In fact, he will be an embarrassm­ent. He has already upset the EU and Muslims and other groups with his undiplomat­ic behaviour, his gaffes and lack of diplomacy which shows him up to be the last person on earth to be a prime minister yet he is still expected to be chosen. WHY?

Valerie Batt-Rawden Warfield, Berkshire

Secrecy in the Tory party

As the new Conservati­ve Party leader is announced, I note that the vote will be announced in full. The number of votes cast for each candidate will be made available, just as it was at every stage of the

selection process. This is exactly as it should be.

However as a Conservati­ve Party member of over 40 years I am still baffled as to why when we have internal selections – there is an insistence on secrecy at every stage and the rules deliberate­ly lack transparen­cy. The rules prevent members knowing the number of votes cast for each candidate at every stage.

Surely if it is good enough for the leadership selection, it should be good for every selection. Unless there is some skuldugger­y going on which is why it is kept secret.

Perhaps the party chairman and board, in light of this clear contradict­ory process, will now change the rules to allow us mere members to know the value of our votes when we cast them.

Simon Fawthrop Bromley, London

Two sides to every story

James Sorene, in his article about Netanyahu (Bibi could have united Israel. He’s only deepened divisions, Voices, Sunday), praises his restraint against the barrage of missiles fired by the Palestinia­ns (causing few casualties), but is seemingly unaware of the 295 (or thereabout­s) killed and the tens of thousands of Palestinia­n civilians injured at the border by Israeli forces.

Martin Heaton Gatley, Greater Manchester

Don’t forget Nazanin

When are the people of Britain going to stand up for this poor lady, Nazanin Zaghari-Ratcliffe, who has been in prison for nothing? We just sit back and forget about her yet she is a British citizen who simply went on holiday. Her husband camped outside the embassy – well, we should have all been doing the same and camping there to show our support. For issues like abortion and war you all go and march, well let’s march to the embassy and set up our camp to help this poor lady and her family. Or are we going to be wimps and let people do what they like to us as the roll-over Brits?

Name and address supplied

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United Kingdom