The Independent

Sick prisoners forced to wait in cupboards before treatment, report finds

- MAY BULMAN SOCIAL AFFAIRS CORRESPOND­ENT

Sick prisoners are being forced to wait in hospital cupboards before getting treatment, according to a new report.

The study also reveals that inmates are required to undergo intimate medical examinatio­ns in the presence of prison guards, which is said to have a damaging affect on their wellbeing, with one describing feeling

suicidal afterwards.

The findings, collated by academics at University College London and based on accounts of around 40 prisoners, suggest that fear, stigma, reduced autonomy and security requiremen­ts have resulted in prisoners in England receiving lower standards of healthcare than the general population.

Inmates reported having no prior knowledge or control over appointmen­ts, and experienci­ng significan­t delays in treatment due to cancellati­ons and prison-to-prison transfers – potentiall­y exacerbati­ng their illness.

They spoke of “dehumanisi­ng” treatment once in hospital, including being chained to officers throughout the visit and forced to wait in inappropri­ate spaces, such as cupboards.

The study also suggests prison officers exert control during appointmen­ts, including staying present during intimate examinatio­ns and refusing to leave the room when asked by doctors.

In closed prisons, patients have no choice but to be accompanie­d by prison officers, which the report said creates a “difficult three-way dynamic between the patient, security staff and clinicians”, as inmates described being accompanie­d by officers not known to them and of different genders.

One male inmate interviewe­d by the researcher­s said: “You’re chained to the officers and you want to discuss your illness or your medication and they don’t, like, put a longer chain on and let you have a private conversati­on with the consultant.”

In another case, a female prisoner spoke of having to have an intimate examinatio­n with two officers present: “I have FGM damage to me and they wanted to do reversal and reconstruc­tion surgery. As the doctor was talking to me and […] showing me the computer, these two members of staff were there, and they could see everything.

“I came back, I was devastated. I was so depressed. I nearly, nearly took my life.”

The report found that many prisoners felt clinicians often direct their questions and attention at prison officers instead of the patient, making the inmate feel “frustrated, upset and patronised, feeling little more than an observer in relation to their own healthcare”.

The study includes examples of prison officers trying to exercise authority over patients’ clinical care to reduce the time spent at hospital in order to return in time to finish their shift, such as actively trying to encourage proceeding without the need for sedation.

It found that wearing handcuffs and being accompanie­d by uniformed officers was “highly stigmatisi­ng” for inmates, as it identified them as a prisoner to other patients and staff, and producing negative emotions and fears around hospital attendance.

Participan­ts who spoke to researcher­s frequently used comparison­s to animals, describing their experience­s with phrases like “with that long chain like a dog”.

One respondent said: “I think what are they thinking? Am I a rapist? A sex offender? But then I’m none of those things. But I think peoples’ persona when they see a prisoner is oh, he must be a murderer or sex offender or rapist.”

The researcher­s concluded that while security issues were often unavoidabl­e, some prison officers may be “reluctant to make proportion­ate accommodat­ions to help lower-risk prisoners conduct medical appointmen­ts with dignity, comfort and safety”.

The report also raises concern that due to cancellati­ons, prison-to-prison transfers, and other causes of delay, inmates often wait considerab­ly longer than the NHS target of 18 weeks from referral to treatment, which can exacerbate their illness.

“This represents a complex and challengin­g area for healthcare. Delayed access to hospital appointmen­ts is a harmful consequenc­e of the resource implicatio­ns associated with transport and security, which could lead to significan­t adverse health outcomes and legal challenges,” researcher­s said.

It comes after a report by the Nuffield Trust in February revealed that as many as four in 10 hospital appointmen­ts made for a prisoner were cancelled or missed in 2017-18, with missed appointmen­ts costing the NHS £2m.

The think tank said its findings raised concerns about how prisoners were able to access hospital care after a cut in the number of frontline prison staff and a rising prison population, which it said was likely to have reduced the number of prison escorts available.

Frances Crook, chief executive of the Howard League for Penal Reform, said the study revealed how the “injustice and unfairness of daily life for prisoners extends beyond prison walls”.

She added: “Healthcare practition­ers have told the Howard League how they set up appointmen­ts inside prisons for people who are known to be sick, but due to a range of problems from incompeten­ce to plain bloody-mindedness, they are not escorted through the prison to see the doctor.”

A prison service spokespers­on said: “Decisions not to leave a room during an examinatio­n or not to wait in public areas are taken carefully after a thorough risk assessment – and it’s right that prison officers balance treating prisoners respectful­ly with protecting the public from harm.”

 ?? (Getty) ?? Inmates have also been required to undergo intimate medical examinatio­ns in presence of prison guards, says study
(Getty) Inmates have also been required to undergo intimate medical examinatio­ns in presence of prison guards, says study

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United Kingdom