The Independent

Royal Mail fined £1.6m for delivering letters late and overchargi­ng on stamps

- BEN CHAPMAN

Royal Mail has been fined £1.6m for delivering letters late and charging too much for stamps. The communicat­ions watchdog said the privatised postal service missed its target of delivering 93 per cent of first-class post within one working day.

In the 2018-19 financial year, only 91.5 per cent arrived within a day, Ofcom said yesterday. The group did

not provide a “satisfacto­ry explanatio­n and it did not take sufficient steps to get back on track during the year”, Ofcom added. The company met its obligation­s the following year.

Ofcom fined Royal Mail £1.5m for the late deliveries and a further £100,000 for overchargi­ng people for stamps. The regulator capped the price of second-class stamps at 60p between 1 April 2018 and 31 March the following year but Royal Mail increased prices by a penny one week early.

Gaucho Rasmussen, Ofcom’s director of investigat­ions and enforcemen­t, said: “Many people depend on postal services, and our rules are there to ensure they get a good service at an affordable price. Royal Mail let its customers down, and these fines should serve as a reminder that we’ll take action when companies fall short.”

Royal Mail said it was “disappoint­ed” with its first-class postal service for the 2018-19 year and “accepts and understand­s” the decision by Ofcom.

In a statement, the company added: “We worked hard to restore our service quality in 2019-20 and, were it not for the pandemic and its impact on our business in the latter half of March, we were on course to deliver the requisite first-class regulated quality of service target of 93 per cent. Despite our best endeavours, some areas of the UK experience­d a reduction in service levels during March.”

Royal Mail announced 2,000 job cuts last month after admitting it had failed to adapt to a trend of people sending fewer letters and more parcels. The coronaviru­s pandemic had added to its “challenges”, the company said.

 ??  ?? The group did not provide a ‘satisfacto­ry explanatio­n and it did not take sufficient steps to get back on track during the year’, Ofcom said (iStock/Getty)
The group did not provide a ‘satisfacto­ry explanatio­n and it did not take sufficient steps to get back on track during the year’, Ofcom said (iStock/Getty)

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United Kingdom