The Independent

Project Big Picture rejected at Premier League meeting

- JACK DE MENEZES SPORTS NEWS CORRESPOND­ENT

The Premier League have agreed an urgent strategy review involving all 20 clubs after Project Big Picture was rejected at a meeting on Wednesday.

The vote ends any chance of the current proposals - which were being driven by leading figures at Manchester United and Liverpool with support from the English Football League chairman Rick Parry - from being implemente­d in their current guise, although they could still be used as a model to draw up a new framework that will revamp the English pyramid.

The emergency meeting saw those Premier League clubs not included in the ‘Big Six’ voice their opposition to Project Big Picture, which would have seen a significan­t proportion of power afforded to United and Liverpool as well as Chelsea, Arsenal, Manchester City and Tottenham Hotspur.

The other 14 clubs opposed Project Big Picture, while the ‘Big Six’ were not entirely on board with the plans, which had been forged in secret talks between Liverpool, United and Parry over the last three years. At the meeting there was some expression of upset with how Parry has gone about his actions this week, having gone on the record with his comments about Project Big Picture when the story originally broke on Sunday.

With the Premier League following the Football Associatio­n in speaking out against Project Big Picture, the plans are dead in the water. Once it was made clear that there was strong opposition against their proposals, both Liverpool and Manchester United fell in line with the other 18 clubs to unanimousl­y agree that Project Big Picture was not the way forward.

Although Project Big Picture has been the brainchild of Liverpool owner John W Henry and club president Mike Gordon alongside United co-owner Joel Glazer, none of them appeared in the videoconfe­rence meeting. Liverpool were instead represente­d by chairman Tom Werner, while United’s executive vicechairm­an Ed Woodward was in attendance along with chief executive Billy Hogan.

A Premier League statement read: “All 20 Premier League clubs today unanimousl­y agreed that ‘Project Big Picture’ will not be endorsed or pursued by the Premier League, or The FA.

“Further, Premier League Shareholde­rs agreed to work together as a 20-club collective on a strategic plan for the future structures and financing of English football, consulting with all stakeholde­rs to ensure a vibrant, competitiv­e and sustainabl­e football pyramid.

Clubs will work collaborat­ively, in an open and transparen­t process, focusing on competitio­n structure, calendar, governance and financial sustainabi­lity.

“This project has the full support of The FA and will include engagement with all relevant stakeholde­rs including fans, government and, of course, the EFL.”

However, the Premier League has agreed a financial rescue package to offer clubs across League One and League Two, which will support them throughout the 2020/21 season. The £77.2m bailout will include an additional £50m in grants and interest-free loans, which would follow solidarity payments of £27.2m that have already been distribute­d.

But with the Football League throwing its support behind a £250m rescue package that fell under the proposals of Project Big Picture, the decision is set to be a huge blow to a number of clubs that will have hoped for more financial help than is being offered.

The rescue package does not include the Championsh­ip clubs, although talks will continue with the EFL about those in the second-tier, with the Premier League keen for government assistance on the matter.

The statement continued: “Also at today’s meeting it was agreed to make available a rescue package which aims to ensure that League One and League Two clubs will not go out of business as a result of the financial impact of Covid-19 and be able to complete the 2020/21 season.

“League One and League Two clubs rely more heavily on matchday revenue and have fewer resources at their disposal than Championsh­ip or Premier League clubs and are therefore more at risk, especially at a time when fans are excluded from attending matches.

This offer will consist of grants and interest-free loans totalling a further £50m on top of the £27.2m solidarity payments already advanced to League One and League Two this year, making a total of £77.2m.

“Discussion­s will also continue with the EFL regarding Championsh­ip clubs’ financial needs. This addresses Government concerns about lower league clubs’ financial fragility.”

The financial rescue package is a result of the matchday revenue lost by the absence of fans since the coronaviru­s pandemic began seven months ago, although the subject has triggered an ongoing row between sporting bodies and the government over the refusal to allow supporters back into stadia across the country.

Plans were in place for the reintroduc­tion of fans from 1 October following a number of successful pilot events, but they were scrapped last month when coronaviru­s cases started to rise once again.

The Premier League has joined calls behind the Let Fans In campaign, although the government reiterated on Wednesday that it is “too soon” for doors to be reopened given this week’s tightening on restrictio­ns in certain areas.

“Football is not the same without attending fans and the football economy is unsustaina­ble without them,” the Premier League statement added. “The Premier League and all our clubs remain committed to the safe return of fans as soon as possible.”

 ?? (Getty) ?? Proposal led by the Glazers (above) and John W Henry was dismissed
(Getty) Proposal led by the Glazers (above) and John W Henry was dismissed

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United Kingdom