The Independent

Opening up to history has made me a stronger person

- KATY BRAND

When I was 13 years old I very suddenly and very fervently became a full-on evangelica­l Christian. This lasted until I was 19, when I lost my faith in Jesus, or at least the idea that Jesus Christ is the one Saviour of mankind and the only route to eternal life.

This is not a new confession – I wrote and performed a live stand-up tour in 2016-7 called I Was a Teenage Christian (I like straightfo­rward titles) about this very subject, and then in 2019 I took part in a Pilgrimage:

The Road to Rome for BBC2, met the Pope, and declared myself an Atheist (on camera I mean, not directly at the Pope – that would have seemed rude).

I am not here to denigrate people’s faith – this was a personal choice. But the point is I changed my mind. I went from being a four-times-a-week Holy Roller to someone who sees no need to believe in anything more than the beauty of science and nature. And the great catalyst in becoming an Atheist was studying for a degree in theology. I arrived at university full of faith in Jesus, and by the end of the first year, I no longer attended church at all.

I had been warned by members of my congregati­on when I let it be known what I was intending to do. And the news was not especially well received – I had done RE A-Level and that was regarded with suspicion. I was already in trouble for refusing to sign the petition to ban Harry Potter (this was 1997, and they thought they stood a chance of censoring this strange new “occult book aimed at innocent children”. I think we all know how that panned out). But this plan to study theology was a new threat.

I received plenty of unsolicite­d advice: “If you want to study the Bible, you need to go to Bible College where they respect scripture, not tear it apart” and “You shouldn’t be wasting energy on questionin­g the word of God when there are souls that urgently need saving”. My personal favourite was from a tiny, smiling old lady who took my hand and gripped it hard. Her bright-blue eyes were alive as she said with great urgency: “Eighty per cent of Christians lose their faith studying theology at a secular university.” And then she crossed herself and walked away shaking her head with concern at her completely unverifiab­le statistic.

But she was right. I did lose my faith studying theology at a secular university. Because what I understood after a year on the course was that the truth, the history, the reality of the origins of faith, the early church, and how Christiani­ty spread across the globe were all far more complex than the members of my old church were willing to admit.

I felt they didn’t want to know because they felt that complexity is the enemy of faith. When things get complicate­d, beliefs get shaky. If you believe in something simple and reassuring, there is immense comfort in that. The world can feel chaotic and frightenin­g. The last thing you want is a load of messy reality and challengin­g facts marching in and burning it all down.

I was frightened for a little while after I stopped believing, I won’t lie. I wondered who I was. My whole life – literally everything down to the tiniest social engagement – was in that church. And it was gone. I had to figure out what I thought about a lot of things on my own now, or with people I had previously told were going to Hell. It was awkward.

But I’m glad I opened myself up to history, to new evidence, to different and marginalis­ed voices (the real history of Mary Magdalene is a good case study of how women have been smeared and silenced by the church, for example). I think I’m better for it, and happier and stronger too. Because my faith (and I know this doesn’t apply to all believers, but it did to me) was not built on solid ground.

There is much debate at the moment about whether studying the wider reality of British history – the colonialis­m and facilitati­ng of the slave trade in particular – will somehow damage and undermine it, or us as a culture and a people. That it might make us “weaker”.

But only weaker in as much as it will show that some of the assumption­s, the beliefs we have relied upon were not based on reality. But there is such freedom in letting go of narrow and restrictiv­e views and allowing ourselves to see what’s really there. Knowledge only makes you stronger. When I look up at the night sky now, to me the universe seems bigger, not smaller for the lack of a God. I can start to see what’s really there in front of me.

Why I can’t wait for the return of Frasier

Good news on the potential return of Frasier, as Kelsey Grammer hinted that it could be coming back.

Will it hold on to its much-coveted “9am slot” on Channel 4? That is surely the only place in the schedule a sophistica­ted and beautifull­y crafted piece of comedy could ever want to be, where it has appeared as reruns on UK TV for the last three hundred years. Or will it finally make it to prime time?

I am joking, of course because Frasier has always been a show so brilliant it can withstand any time slot. It is a commission­ing marvel too – as a writer of comedy, and a veteran pitcher of new ideas, I can only stand back and admire the balls to head into a meeting with this: “Two wealthy white elitist snobby brothers are both highly successful psychother­apists who love classical music, art, opera and discussing philosophy, but – here’s the kicker – one is from the Jungian school and the other favours a Freudian thesis, so the inherent tension is always hilarious.” I mean, hats off to all of them.

Of course, the character of Frasier already had serious recognitio­n from Cheers, one of the most successful sitcoms of all time. So that helps. But the writers transcende­d that legacy and made it into something of its own that was consistent­ly smart, human, true and laugh out loud funny. The additional characters of Niles, Daphne and Martin Crane felt as though they had always existed.

So I am waiting with crossed fingers, because I really loved that show. It was simply superb. It will be interestin­g to see how the new Frasier reflects modern times, too, though it was ahead of its own time in many ways.

I hope it comes back as sharp and smart and funny as ever because, frankly, I could use a laugh.

 ?? (iStock) ?? There is such freedom in letting go of narrow and restrictiv­e views
(iStock) There is such freedom in letting go of narrow and restrictiv­e views
 ?? (Getty) ?? Kelsey Grammer as the comical psychother­apist
(Getty) Kelsey Grammer as the comical psychother­apist

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United Kingdom