The Independent

Pacific trade deal benefits dwarfed by hit from Brexit

Partnershi­p hailed by PM would increase GDP by just 0.08%

- ANDREW WOODCOCK POLITICAL EDITOR

A new Pacific partnershi­p hailed by Boris Johnson as a key to post-Brexit prosperity would increase GDP by just 0.08 per cent, official figures show – less than a 40th of the expected economic hit from leaving the European Union .

Labour warned that the benefit could slump to just 0.017 per cent (£400m) if Malaysia continued to hold out against ratificati­on of the deal, according to figures from the Department for Internatio­nal Trade.

The forecast £1.7bn annual increase in UK exports to countries like Malaysia, Singapore and Australia from membership of the Comprehens­ive and Progressiv­e Agreement for Trans-Pacific Partnershi­p (CPTPP) contrasts with the £2bn hit in sales of food and drink products alone to the EU in the first three months of this year.

The figures emerged as a new poll found that Britain remains bitterly split over Brexit, five years on from the historic 52-48 vote to Leave on 23 June 2016.

The Savanta ComRes survey suggested that the UK would now vote to Remain in the EU by a majority of 51-49 per cent, but would reject the opportunit­y to rejoin by the same wafer-thin margin.

Less than a third of respondent­s (31 per cent) said that Brexit has been a success, with slightly more (34 per cent) branding it a failure. But there was a clear majority (51 per cent) who believed the experience has left the UK more divided, compared to just 13 per cent who said it was more united.

Writing in The Independen­t, polling guru John Curtice , of Strathclyd­e University, said that people who reached voting age since 2016 backed Remain by a margin of more than two to one, meaning that there was probably no majority for Leave when the UK finally exited the EU on 1 January.

“Far from being ready to ‘move on’, voters are still deeply divided on the wisdom of the decision to leave the EU,” said Prof Curtice.

Brexit minister Lord Frost – the architect of the PM’s EU trade deal – admitted that Leavers did not anticipate relations with the remaining 27 members would be as “relatively difficult” as they are now. He told MPs that it was reasonable to expect them to remain “a little bumpy for some time”.

A report by the UK in a Changing Europe thinktank found declining trade with traditiona­l partners across the EU, with Danish exports falling 17 per cent over the long-term and the UK slipping from fifth to eighth position in national trade with Germany.

Despite this, Mr Johnson claimed that the decision to leave the EU was now “part of our history” and said that the UK had benefited through being able to put in place a new immigratio­n system, sign a free trade agreement with Australia, make plans to set up freeports and begin negotiatio­ns to join the CPTPP. “This government got Brexit done and we’ve already reclaimed our money, laws, borders and waters,” said the prime minister. “The decision to leave the EU may now be part of our history, but our clear mission is to utilise the freedoms it brings to shape a better future for our people.”

But Tory grandee and former deputy prime minister Lord Heseltine, now president of the European Movement, said: “Five years on, Brexit is far from ‘done’. It has only just begun and the forecast is ominous.

“Storm clouds are gathering on the horizon, chief among them the threat to the Good Friday peace agreement in Northern Ireland. The fishing industry has now voiced its betrayal and the Australian trade deal will slowly erode the competitiv­eness of British farmers over the next 15 years. Meanwhile, the financial services industry quietly moves its activities to Europe in order to escape the continuing Brexit uncertaint­y.”

Official estimates of the potential boost to the UK economy from CPTPP membership were branded “teeny”, as it emerged that Liz Truss ’s Department for Internatio­nal Trade (DIT) estimated it will add just £1.8bn – or 0.08 per cent – to UK GDP in 15 years’ time.

London School of Economics trade expert Dr Thomas Sampson told The Independen­t that this contrasted with the 4 per cent hit to GDP from Brexit forecast by the government’s independen­t Office for Budget Responsibi­lity.

“A small gain is better than nothing,” said Dr Sampson. “But any potential gains from joining the CPTPP are teeny compared to the costs of Brexit and there is no realistic possibilit­y that CPTPP membership can offset the economic costs of Brexit.”

Launching negotiatio­ns to join the CPTPP on Monday, Mr Johnson said membership would “open up unparallel­ed opportunit­ies” for British businesses, while Ms Truss said that the region is “where Britain’s greatest opportunit­ies lie”.

But Labour’s Emily Thornberry said that the projection­s published by DIT raised questions over whether membership was worth the risk of undercutti­ng UK farmers and exposing the government to legal action from corporatio­ns challengin­g social and environmen­tal protection’s under the partnershi­p’s Investor-State Dispute Settlement (ISDS) mechanism. “Labour welcomes any trade agreement that will create jobs in our country, help our exporters do more business abroad, and support our economic recovery, and if the CPTPP can offer those benefits, then as a country, we would be foolish not to think about joining,” said the shadow trade secretary.

But she added: “We have to be sure that the benefits are worth the risks, and if those benefits could be as low as a 0.017 per cent increase in GDP, then that is alarmingly small compared to the price we are paying to join.”

Liberal Democrat trade spokespers­on Sarah Olney said the government should be focusing on the “mountains” of Brexit red tape depressing commerce with Europe ahead of the more limited benefits of the proposed partnershi­p with far-flung CPTPP members.

“It is shocking that the government is presenting these negotiatio­ns as a free trade triumph when the expected benefit to our economy is a drop in the ocean,” she said.

Meanwhile, campaigner­s from Global Justice Now warned that polluting corporatio­ns would use the ISDS mechanism to challenge climate protection­s in the courts, in what director

Nick Dearden branded “an act of environmen­tal vandalism in the year we host Cop26”.

The DIT insisted that the government would “protect the UK’s right to regulate in the national interest” – including safeguardi­ng the NHS – in signing up to the ISDS provisions.

And it said that the forecast £1.8bn GDP boost by 2036 could be significan­tly increased by the expected growth of middleclas­s consumers demanding luxury goods and services in the Pacific region.

“While the modelling provides an indication of the likely economic impacts, it does therefore not tell the whole story and should be understood in the context of underlying economic growth and other potential changes in the global economy,” said the department. BACK TO TOP

Want your views to be included in The Independen­t Daily Edition letters page? Email us by tapping here letters@independen­t.co.uk. Please include your address

 ?? (AFP/Getty) ?? A matter of Truss: trade secretary praised region for its ‘opportunit­ies’
(AFP/Getty) A matter of Truss: trade secretary praised region for its ‘opportunit­ies’
 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United Kingdom