The Independent

Refusing to treat NHS staff differentl­y is a crucial error

- STEPHEN DORRELL

When John Major asked me to be health secretary he made it clear that my job was to keep the NHS out of the newspapers.

That reflected his view that patients aren’t interested in sweeping promises of “NHS reform”; they support the principles of the NHS, they value the commitment and

profession­alism of those who work in it – and they expect the politician­s to find ways to work with the NHS to deliver the principles on which the service was founded. When the NHS is in the headlines, it is usually because the politician­s have forgotten these cardinal principles.

It has been clear for months that every part of the NHS would be working under unsustaina­ble pressure during the current winter season as it grapples with the combined effects of lengthenin­g waiting lists, staff shortages and collapsing social care. These trends were, sadly, well establishe­d before the pandemic but have all been exacerbate­d both by the pandemic and this year’s flu epidemic.

It has also been clear that Pay Review Body recommenda­tions that were based on evidence submitted by the government on 23 February 2022 would not be regarded by NHS staff as providing a fair basis for a pay settlement for this winter – with inflation running at virtually double the rate of 12 months ago.

Against this background the government made several crucial mistakes:

1. It allowed itself to be challenged by staff across the traditiona­l public sector; it should have recognised that NHS staff are seen differentl­y by most people – particular­ly in view of the pressures and risks that they accepted during the pandemic;

2. It should have prioritise­d a settlement with NHS staff in order to maintain services during an unpreceden­ted winter crisis;

3. It could easily have done so by asking the review body, in the exceptiona­l circumstan­ces of 2022 to make an interim recommenda­tion for the current year – reflecting the practice of many employers across the private sector;

4. The health secretary should never have refused to discuss pay – the very issue that lies at the heart of the dispute;

5. It is simply extraordin­ary to waste parliament­ary time by introducin­g legislatio­n that removes the right of NHS staff to withdraw their labour in a future dispute at a time when

ministers and MPs should be focusing on resolving the current dispute.

These mistakes have led to a protracted dispute with staff who enjoy widespread public support and whose primary ask is that their employers recognise that their living standards had already fallen when they gave unstinting service during the pandemic – and now face further decline as a result of inflation.

The worst insult to these staff was the endless repetition by ministers of the assertion that “the taxpayer can’t afford a 19 per cent increase for the nurses” when the Royal College of Nursing (RCN) leadership was making it crystal clear that it was simply seeking a negotiatio­n.

While ministers chanted from the grandstand, NHS staff were dealing with unpreceden­ted pressures and seeking recognitio­n of the pressures on their families. It is good news that the prime minister finally had the sense to tell his ministers to engage with the issues; his mistake was not to do so on the day he appointed them.

Stephen Dorrell is a Liberal Democrat politician who served as health secretary under John Major from 1995 to 1997. He was also chair of the House of Commons Health select committee from 2010 to 2014

BACK TO TOP

 ?? (AFP/Getty) ?? It is simply extraordin­ary to waste parliament­ary time by introducin­g legislatio­n that removes the right of NHS staff to withdraw their labour
(AFP/Getty) It is simply extraordin­ary to waste parliament­ary time by introducin­g legislatio­n that removes the right of NHS staff to withdraw their labour
 ?? ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United Kingdom