The Jewish Chronicle

Britain opposes WHO anti-Israel resolution

- BY DANIEL SUGARMAN HOPES FOR A HEALTHIER RELATIONSH­IP WITH UN BODY

JEWISH COMMUNAL organisati­ons have praised the government for voting against a World Health Organisati­on [WHO] resolution attacking Israel.

The UK was the only European country to do so at the WHO’s annual conference in Geneva.

The resolution — Agenda Item 19: “Health conditions in the occupied Palestinia­n territory, including east Jerusalem, and in the occupied Syrian Golan” — singled out Israel for criticism and included recommenda­tions about access to health care for Palestinia­ns in Gaza and the West Bank.

In a statement, the UK mission to the United Nations in Geneva said it had voted against “the politicisa­tion of the World Health Assembly.

“The reason we had this decision today was not because of the health needs of the people in the Occupied Palestinia­n Territorie­s, important though they are”, the statement said.

“No, the reason we had this decision today was because of the political situation relating to the Occupied Palestinia­n Territorie­s.

“We do not have decisions in the World Health Assembly relating to every conflict, or civil war, or political stalemate around the world. This is the only one”.

In March, Britain said it would vote against all future UN Human Rights Council resolution­s on Israel’s conduct in the occupied territorie­s unless the body ended its “disproport­ion and bias” against the Jewish state. The WHO is an agency within the United Nations.

“The WHO is one of the world’s most important technical agencies”, the UK’s statement continued.

“It should not be a place where we argue over geopolitic­s. If we politicize the WHO, we do so at our peril, and we do the cause of global health, and the health of our citizens, a grave disservice”.

Richard Verber, the senior vice-president of the Board of Deputies, praised the UK government “for taking a principled stand.

“The only resolution dealing with a specific country was aimed at Israel”, he said.

“In doing so, the UK rejected the politicisa­tion of the important issue of health and the unacceptab­le antiIsrael bias present in UN bodies.”

Simon Johnson, chief executive of the Jewish Leadership Coalition, said the WHO’s resolution had “singled Israel out for criticism.

“We are grateful to HM government for the vote against yesterday’s resolution”, he said.

“For [the UK] to be the only European country to vote against the resolution confirms the Government’s determinat­ion to stand up against the obsessive campaign to delegitimi­se Israel in internatio­nal bodies.”

ISRAEL’S hopes for a better relationsh­ip with the UN World Health Organisati­on were given a boost this week after its preferred candidate, Dr Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesu­s, was elected as the body’s new director-general.

Dr Tedros, as he is known, is the former Ethiopian health minister and has promised major reform of the WHO, which regularly singles out Israel for condemnati­on.

Israel’s ambassador to the UN in Geneva, Aviva Raz Schechter, said she was “looking forward to working with Dr Tedros to improve health access around the world, and fighting the politicisa­tion of World Health Organisati­on”.

Last week the ambassador claimed that — under pressure from Syria — the WHO had “decided to hide a positive report on Israel from the public eye”.

Instead, in a resolution cosponsore­d by Syria, the WHO annual assembly targeted Israel over “health conditions in the occupied Palestinia­n territory”.

The resolution was also backed by the Palestinia­ns, together with Algeria, Cuba, Ecuador, Egypt, Kuwait, Libya, Pakistan, Saudi Arabia, South Africa, Tunisia and Venezuela.

Hillel Neuer, executive director of the monitoring group, UN Watch, said: “The UN should reject the hijacking of its world health agenda by Arab regimes and allied dictatorsh­ips.”

 ?? PHOTO: GETTY IMAGES ?? UK vote was a protest against the World Health Organisati­on’s pro-Palestinia­n bias
PHOTO: GETTY IMAGES UK vote was a protest against the World Health Organisati­on’s pro-Palestinia­n bias

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United Kingdom