The Jewish Chronicle

UK must not copy Trump’s Jerusalem embassy move

- BY AMI AYALON, GILEAD SHER, AND ORNI PETRUSCHKA

IN RECENT weeks, there have been some voices — such as the Board of Deputies and Tory MP Michael Fabricant — calling on the UK to follow the US lead and move the UK embassy in Israel from Tel Aviv to Jerusalem.

As Israelis, Jerusalem is our capital. Jerusalem has been the spiritual centre for the Jews ever since King David entered its gates more than 3,000 years ago. It became the official capital of the state of Israel on December 13, 1949, a year and half after the establishm­ent of the state. It was the capital when the eastern part of the city was under Jordanian control, and remains its capital after the entire city was conquered in the Six-Day War in 1967. Still, we believe it would not be in the interests of Israel if the UK were to move the embassy to Jerusalem as a stand-alone, symbolic act, as did the US.

Israel was establishe­d as the democratic home for the Jewish people, in the spirit of its Declaratio­n of Independen­ce, as the need for such a home became evident after the Holocaust.

Israel will be able to preserve its Jewish and democratic identity only if a Palestinia­n state is establishe­d alongside it. That is because it is a Palestinia­n state where millions of Palestinia­ns need to reside, and that is the only way in which Israel can include within its borders a clear Jewish majority.

Needless to say, as stipulated in the Declaratio­n of Independen­ce, the Jewish majority will have an obligation to respect the rights of the Arab minority which will remain Israeli citizens.

Two states for two peoples is the only formula which enables the preservati­on of Israel’s Jewish identity, democracy and security. The so-called one-state solution will likely lead to an apartheid regime, or to a continuous and violent chaos, or both.

The formula of two-states for two peoples, as has been shaped for more than 100 years since the Balfour Declaratio­n, is based in UN resolution­s which were accepted by the Israeli government­s, and which are acceptable in principle by most Israelis, Palestinia­ns, and the internatio­nal community including the Arab League states.

In all the internatio­nally-accepted incarnatio­ns of the two-states formula, the Israeli capital is defined to be in the Jewish neighbourh­oods of Jerusalem, and the Palestinia­n capital in the Arab neighbourh­oods of Jerusalem.

Thus, transferri­ng the UK embassy in Israel from Tel Aviv to Jerusalem will be a positive step only if done in the right context: either the context of the establishm­ent of a Palestinia­n state, as part of an agreement between Israel and the Palestinia­ns; or while simultaneo­usly announcing plans for an eventual UK embassy in the eastern, Arab, part of Jerusalem, once a Palestinia­n state is establishe­d. But outside that context it will make the possibilit­y of negotiatio­ns and constructi­ve process more remote, and will likely increase the level of violence. That is exactly what happened following the transfer of the US embassy to Jerusalem — with increased violence and hundreds of fatalities.

Instead, the UK can play a constructi­ve role by endorsing the vision of two states for two peoples, and encouragin­g the two sides to move forward by taking independen­t steps that gradually lead to such vision. The first steps would be towards disengagin­g from one another and creating a reality of two states on the ground, while preserving the conditions for an eventual negotiated agreement.

For example, constructi­ve steps include ending subsidies for terror and incitement; a long-term Fatah-Hamas truce, allowing for rehabilita­tion in Gaza while preventing arming; an Israeli cessation of settlement building outside of the main settlement blocs. In addition, Israel must prepare for the relocation into Israel proper of settlers who currently live east of the security fence it built in the West Bank, while maintainin­g the security statusquo in the West Bank, including the presence of IDF.

Similarly, productive actions by the internatio­nal community, of which the UK is an influentia­l member, would include: presenting and vigorously pursuing a balanced two-states vision; promoting constructi­ve steps that advance a reality of two states; unequivoca­lly denouncing any act of terror, incitement and violence; recognizin­g a Palestinia­n state as a full UN member; coordinati­ng a regional dialogue within the scope of the Arab Peace Initiative; assisting the establishm­ent of a regional anti-Iran coalition.

 ?? IMAGES GETTY PHOTO: ??
IMAGES GETTY PHOTO:

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United Kingdom