The Jewish Chronicle

Al roots of Labour antisemiti­sm

-

and victim-blaming, the report makes two claims about today’s Labour party.

First, that the party can now reasonably be described as “institutio­nally antisemiti­c”, according to the precise definition offered by the 1999 Macpherson Report. Perhaps tomorrow will be different but today the party is failing to provide “an appropriat­e and profession­al service” to its Jewish members and this is demonstrat­ed in its “processes, behaviours and attitudes”, in unwitting prejudice, ignorance, thoughtles­sness and racist stereotypi­ng which disadvanta­ge”, and in “the failure of the organisati­on openly and adequately to recognise and address its existence and causes by policy, example and leadership”.

Second, the report shows that once the antisemiti­sm crisis is placed within four larger contexts, it is revealed as having much deeper roots and being much harder to eradicate than has been assumed.

The first context is historical. There is a long and evolving tradition of left antisemiti­sm, littleunde­rstood, which these days often comes ‘dressed up as anti-Zionism’, which is even less understood.

The second is intellectu­al. Contempora­ry left antisemiti­sm has a ‘philosophy’ of sorts. Large parts of the left are in thrall to the simplistic ‘two-camps’ world view that divides the world up into the good- Launch: Dave Rich

oppressed and the bad-oppressors. That world view has turned the complex and tragic Israeli-Palestinia­n conflict into a cartoon or morality play peopled only by good and evil, to be romanticis­ed and demonised.

The third is the unpreceden­ted influence of the far-Left on the party today. The Corbyn surge has produced not only a mass membership but an experience­d cadre of sectarians on the prowl, some inside the party, some stalking party members online, all of them spreading not only the polarizing and demonising two camps world view but also a trolling and bullying culture. It is simply a shaming fact that as Sean Matgamna has put it, for some Jews who resigned recently, the Corbyn surge plainly felt like an antisemiti­c purge.

The final context is one man. Around the neck of the party has been hung an albatross in the shape of Jeremy Corbyn’s political record (and that of some of his closest aides and supporters) of public support for antisemiti­c forms of ‘anti-Zionism’. In the absence of an auto-critique, we have had instead the defence of that record by party members. And that defence is how the normalizat­ion of antisemiti­sm in the party is taking place.

I wrote the report mindful of two fears. Many Jews are understand­ably fearful that antisemiti­sm could be normalised in the country too, if Labour gets into government. And then there is my tribe, still there in North Shields and places like it, fearful that there will never be a new economic direction for the country in which they can write themselves a future. I want a party that can address and allay both those fears. Maybe the report is my last go at persuading the Labour Party to be that party. If it can’t, we will need a new one that can.

Professor Alan Johnson is a senior research fellow at Bicom

 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United Kingdom