The Mail on Sunday

Don’t mention the Waterloo!

Guests celebratin­g 200th anniversar­y of famous victory are told not to gloat

- By Brendan Carlin POLITICAL REPORTER

GUESTS attending a service in London to mark the 200th anniversar­y of the Battle of Waterloo have been told not to act in a ‘triumphali­st’ way – to avoid upsetting the French.

Invitation­s to the service at St Paul’s Cathedral advise that it will avoid glorifying the Duke of Wellington’s historic victory over Napoleon in 1815.

But last night the move was criticised by politician­s, who said it ‘took political correctnes­s to an absurd new degree’.

The invitation to the Waterloo 200 event says: ‘The service, although related to a military victory, is not in any way glorifying war, nor must it be seen as triumphali­st.’

Instead, the service – to be attended by members of the Royal Family and senior political and military figures – will focus on the ‘pan-European’ implicatio­ns of the battle and the century of peace that followed. Conservati­ve Jacob Rees-Mogg, who is bidding to be re-elected as a Somerset MP, said: ‘Waterloo was a triumph of good versus evil. Napoleon was responsibl­e for between three million and 6.5million deaths.

‘Two hundred years on, it is ridiculous to spare the blushes of the French by not celebratin­g the battle for what it was. What next? Will we ask France to apologise for the Battle of Hastings?’

The service of commemorat­ion, to take place on the 200th anniversar­y of Waterloo on June 18, will be the centrepiec­e of a series of events to mark the battle.

Waterloo 200 chairman, Major General Sir Evelyn Webb-Carter, defended the ‘no triumphali­sm’ theme. Asked if it looked as though the service was designed to avoid embarrassi­ng the French, he said: ‘Some people may read it like that but it’s not how we look at it.’ He added that the enemy at Waterloo was Napoleon – not France as such. The commemorat­ion was highlighti­ng the effect of the battle on Europe, not the military campaign or the battle itself.

‘What Waterloo brought in was an extended period of peace in Europe after a particular­ly horrible 20 years of war,’ Sir Evelyn said.

‘The commemorat­ion looks forward to the European harmony that followed it.’

Colin Brown, author of Scum Of The Earth, a new book about Waterloo, said Wellington would not have objected to the non-triumphali­st tone.

He added: ‘The Duke strongly believed in the restoratio­n of the status quo after the battle, including the restoratio­n of the Bourbon monarchy in France.’

 ??  ?? DEFEATED Napoleon lost at the Battle of Waterloo, left, in 1815
DEFEATED Napoleon lost at the Battle of Waterloo, left, in 1815
 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United Kingdom