The Mail on Sunday

The MARXIST MANIFESTO

Corbyn and his hard Left cronies meet in shadow of the Savoy to plot their revolution

- By Brendan Carlin and Harry Cole

JEREMY CORBYN gathered his closest hard-Left allies yesterday to sign off his radical ‘ Marxist manifesto’ that includes a deluge of new taxes and spending pledges.

The Labour leader was joined at plush offices behind the Savoy in London by key aides such as Seumas Milne and a slew of controvers­ial senior party figures to hammer out the final details of his Election policies amid a bitter civil war over immigratio­n. Last night Mr Corbyn hailed his manifesto as a blueprint for a ‘more egalitaria­n society’ adding: ‘I am very, very proud of the contents of it.’

Under Clause V of the party’s constituti­on, the leader must share his programme for government with his Shadow Cabinet, trade union bankroller­s such as Len McCluskey and the powerful NEC before it can be published.

But trust among the various factions is so limited that mobile phones were confiscate­d and no one was allowed to keep a copy of the manifesto to avoid a repeat of the humiliatin­g 2017 leak.

Labour’s conference mandated the party to stick to EU free movement rules but party strategist­s feared such a policy would see the party wiped out with Leavesuppo­rting voters in their northern heartlands.

The Mail on Sunday was told the issue was ‘fudged’, with the manifesto planning to state simply that freedom of movement for EU citizens would continue if the UK stayed in the bloc but is ‘a matter for the negotiatio­ns’ if the country leaves. The manifesto is due to be published on Thursday but last night sources said it contains significan­tly more Left-wing policies than the 2017 version.

Insiders told this newspaper the radical blueprint for government agreed unanimousl­y last night is set to include:

Scrapping of ‘opt-outs’ for the EU Working Time Directive, banning anyone from working for more than 48 hours a week and potentiall­y risking NHS chaos;

A Right to Food Act that could be used to control some food prices;

A windfall tax on oil companies that risks pushing up petrol prices;

A widespread nationalis­ation programme of trains, energy firms and broadband providers;

The effective abolition of academies and free schools, with all educationa­l institutio­ns bought back under local council control;

A milkshake tax, with a massive expansion of the sugar levy;

Abolition of local NHS Clinical Commission­ing Groups;

A new Cabinet Minister for Women and new laws to make misogyny a hate crime, which one critic claimed would amount to outlawing wolf-whistling.

The manifesto was written by Andrew Fisher, despite the key Corbyn aide saying in a private memo earlier this year that ‘I no longer have faith that we can succeed’. He also accused colleagues of a ‘lack of profession­alism, competence and human decency’.

The radical Left- winger once boasted on camera that he had ‘very violent, bloody nightmares… fantasies’ about hitting former

Labour Cabinet Minister James Purnell because of hi s vi ews on welfare.

Among those present to sign off t he charter was controvers­ial MEP Richard Corbett, one of Labour’s most ardent pro-Europeans. The leader of the party in Brussels sparked outrage last year for appearing to celebrate the death of Leave voters. Talking about the prospects for Remain in a second referendum, Corbett said: ‘As someone joked to me the other day, where there’s death, there’s hope.’ The remark was condemned for being ‘as tasteless as it is misguided’.

Also involved was key Corbyn backer Jon Lansman, who founded the powerful grassroots Momentum group, and who last year admitted possible economic chaos under a Corbyn government, saying: ‘ Other government­s have faced challenges like runs on the pound. And we may face similar things.’

They were j oined by Claudia Webbe. She was such an ardent defender of Ken Livingston­e that when the ex-London Mayor was suspended from the party in 2006 after likening a Jewish journalist to a concentrat­ion camp guard, she said the decision ‘smacks in the face of true democracy’.

A member of Labour’s ruling NEC, the Islington councillor has been selected to replace scandalhit former MP Keith Vaz in Leices

‘Work time rules could cause chaos in the NHS’

LEN McCLUSKEY

Accused Jewish community of ‘intransige­nt hostility’ towards Jeremy Corbyn

CLAUDIA WEBBE

Railed against Ken Livingston­e’s suspension after he compared Jewish reporter to concentrat­ion camp guard

ter East – a rock-solid Labour seat. Last night Labour refused to be drawn on the details of its manifesto but one source present branded plans to cap the number of hours people can work ‘a f****** mistake’.

If the EU Working Time Directive – which limits the working week to 48 hours and which most people can currently ignore – was extended to doctors and nurses, even some Labour MPs fear it would cause chaos in the NHS. Another source insisted the manifesto was nowhere near as radical as leaks suggest.

One MP said: ‘I think you’ll find there is a lot on the one hand this and the other hand that. There is plenty of wriggle room.’

Labour Party chairman Ian Lavery said: ‘This is the best manifesto you are likely to see.’

Asked if it was more radical than in 2017, Mr Lavery said that it was, adding: ‘We sorted all the problems and it was fantastic.

‘Everybody was up for it, very amicable, good discussion­s, good debate, very lengthy because we have got a great manifesto.’

Tory Trade Secretary Liz Truss branded it ‘a Marxist manifesto for Britain that will plunge this country into extortiona­te debt and deliver division and delay.’

ANDREW FISHER

Boasted he had ‘very violent, bloody fantasies’ about assaulting former Labour Minister for cutting benefits

RICHARD CORBETT

Sickeningl­y claimed Remain would win second referendum because elderly Brexit voters were dying off

SEUMAS MILNE

Defended brutal Communist dictator Joseph Stalin, suggesting number of purge victims had been exaggerate­d

MANY of us stay loyal to brands we love, long after we should have given them up. The quality of the material falls, the price rises, the workmanshi­p declines, yet still we cling to what we know because human beings are like that. We want to continue to believe the best of things we are familiar with.

But in the end, the truth cannot be ignored any longer, and we look elsewhere. Surely it is time that millions of loyal, decent Labour voters realised that the party they still vote for bears almost no relation to what it once was, or to what it is supposed to be. It is abusing an honoured old name, and selling goods which are not just inferior to what went before, but utterly unlike them. They should look elsewhere.

The party of Clement Attlee, that did so much to win the war and which achieved the great peaceful r evoluti on of t he welfare state and the NHS – which even quite hardline Tories eventually came to accept as just –has gone.

The party of Hugh Gaitskell,

Harold Wilson and Jim Callaghan, which represente­d the patriotic, socially conservati­ve working class and embodied the Methodist Christiani­ty which helped to found Labour, has also disappeare­d. Even if you did not agree with them, you could respect them and assume their intentions were benevolent.

Into its place, but using its name, have come completely different f orces, i deas and movements. Various strands of Trotskyism, homeless communists left marooned by the fall of the USSR, wild egalitaria­ns who hate success, terrorist sympathise­rs, crackpots, intolerant zealots of all kind – and now shameless antisemite­s and similar bigots as well – have streamed into the vacuum which remained when Old Labour died in the 1980s.

Just look at the team now signi ng off Labour’s manifesto, described in today’s Mail on Sunday, to see how the intellectu­al quality of the party has diminished and been transforme­d since the days of experience­d heavyweigh­ts such as Denis Healey and Anthony Crosland. The success of Blairism kept the unlovely forces of the angry, resentment-driven militants in check for a while. But Blairism’s eventual defeat in 2010 triggered the revolution which put Jeremy Corbyn into the leadership. It did not stop there. It began a general process of takeover and transforma­tion so that Labour’s governing bodies and its selection of parliament­ary candidates have come increasing­ly under the control of the dedicated, concrete-hard left.

Such people are no doubt the source of the plan for nationalis ed broadband service, a scheme which – if implemente­d, –will swiftly demonstrat­e what state control can do to a formerly vibrant part of the economy. Alas, far too few can now remember t he creaky, obstructiv­e slowness and inefficien­cy of the old nationalis­ed industries. If Mr Corbyn can cobb le together a majority, millions unborn in the preThatche­r era will find out in glum detail what they missed.

Only an outright Tory victory stands between us and t he Corbyn disaster. But the country is still barely awake to the danger. Boris Johnson and his team may feel reassured by polling figures which show them ahead, but there may be deeper currents the polls cannot see. It is not good enough merely to repeat slogans and rely on the slick methods of modern electionee­ring. Above all, this is no time for complacenc­y. Mr Johnson must take the fight to the Corbynites and show them up for what they undoubtedl­y are – unfit to govern.

 ??  ??
 ??  ??
 ??  ??
 ??  ??
 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United Kingdom