The Mail on Sunday

Abolish ‘incompeten­t and biased’ electoral watchdog, say Tories

- By Brendan Carlin POLITICAL CORRESPOND­ENT

BRITAIN’S electoral watchdog, which is investigat­ing Boris Johnson’s ‘cash for curtains’ flat makeover at No 10, was last night branded ‘biased’, ‘incompeten­t’ and ripe for abolition.

Tory MPs tore into the Electoral Commission’s ‘lamentable record’ and urged the Prime Minister to press ahead with replacing it.

Senior Tory backbenche­r Peter Bone led the charge, saying the watchdog ‘was not fit to investigat­e a drinks party in a brewery. This is a biased and incompeten­t organisati­on. It should be abolished. And if the Government does not introduce such a Bill in the Queen’s Speech this month, I will propose it myself in a backbench Bill.’

He was joined by Tory colleagues Philip Davies and Andrew Bridgen in demanding a radical overhaul of the watchdog. The MPs denied they were taking revenge on the Commission for the makeover investigat­ion.

But Mr Bone accused the watchdog of unveiling the inquiry to save its own skin and stave off radical plans to replace it, a move that some expected to be in this month’s

‘It has a history of politicall­y motivated investigat­ions’

announceme­nt of new Government legislatio­n. Last night, one Cabinet Minister privately admitted that with the inquiry under way, it would be ‘very tricky’ for Mr Johnson to go ahead with a major revamp.

In a dramatic interventi­on into the No 10 flat row last week, the watchdog – which regulates party funding and political donations – announced it was carrying out ‘a formal investigat­ion’ to look into whether the Tory Party had any role in transactio­ns relating to the makeover and if they were properly declared.

It sparked anger on the Tory benches for allegedly prejudging the outcome of the inquiry by saying it was ‘satisfied that there are reasonable grounds to suspect that an offence or offences may have occurred’.

Mr Johnson has insisted that he settled the £58,000 bill to redecorate the flat himself, but there are claims that this was only after the Party originally paid for the work to help out the cash-strapped Prime Minister.

Tory staff have now been warned by party bosses that they face severe criminal consequenc­es if they fail to co- operate with the Commission’s inquiry and hand over all relevant informatio­n about the controvers­ial refurbishm­ent.

However, many MPs had been expecting this month’s Queen’s Speech to include plans to rein in the watchdog after a series of highly controvers­ial investigat­ions as well of allegation­s of anti-Brexit bias.

Only last year, Electoral Commission chairman Sir John Holmes was denied a second four-year term by MPs. He had faced criticism for saying that he regretted the result of the Brexit referendum in 2016 and condemning the ‘panoply of Euroscepti­c nonsense’ from proLeave campaigner­s months after he was nominated as head of the watchdog. Despite a requiremen­t to ‘uphold its impartiali­ty’, three former commission­ers also criticised Brexit while in their posts.

The watchdog also came under fire for allegedly persecutin­g Brexit campaigner Darren Grimes by slapping a £20,000 fine on him for electoral offences during the referendum – only to see the penalty overturned in the courts.

Yesterday, the watchdog was accused of wrongly recording two charitable gifts by tycoon Sir James Dyson as donations to Tory MP Michelle Donelan, which meant the BBC could refer to the entreprene­ur as a prominent Tory backer.

The watchdog has been also been slated by MPs across the political spectrum for being ‘too bureaucrat­ic’. And last year, Tory Party c hai r woman Amanda Mill i ng appeared to signal that the Commission in its current form would be replaced by saying it was ‘simply not fit for purpose’ and was ‘too willing to push for the prosecutio­n of political and party activists’.

Last night, North-West Leicesters­hire MP Mr Bridgen said the regulator had a ‘history of politicall­y motivated investigat­ions’. He echoed his party chairman’s verdict, s ayi ng: ‘ I t has demonstrat­ed through its actions that it is not fit for purpose in its present form.’

Shipley MP Mr Davies said the watchdog had a ‘lamentable track record and ‘a massive overhaul’ was needed ‘to restore some credibilit­y and confidence in this organisati­on’. However, Labour accused the Tories of trying to hobble the watchdog because it was investigat­ing how the Prime Minister paid for his flat refurbishm­ent.

Shadow Cabinet Office Minister Cat Smith said: ‘The Conservati­ves’ attempts to weaken and intimidate the Electoral Commission come straight out of the Republican Party playbook.

‘This is just one part of a concerted strategy by the Tories to remove scrutiny and proper accountabi­lity. The Conservati­ve Government must make a clear statement revoking these threats.’

Government insiders played down the prospect of immediate action over the Commission, saying an independen­t review into it was still ongoing.

A Commission spokesman said: ‘Parliament has given us a duty to investigat­e electoral offences. Where we have reasonable grounds to suspect that such offences may have occurred, we are duty bound to act in order to establish the facts. This process should not be undermined by unsubstant­iated allegation­s of bias.’ Sources also insisted that in recording donations to Ms Donelan, it simply reflected how the gifts was declared by the MP on the Commons’ register of outside interests.

‘This is part of a strategy by Tories to avoid scrutiny’

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United Kingdom