The Mail on Sunday

BBC threatened with contempt for refusing to release papers on Bashir’s Diana letter

- By Mark Hookham

THE BBC broke the law by failing to disclose informatio­n about a note written by Princess Diana after her infamous interview with rogue reporter Martin Bashir, the Informatio­n Commission­er has ruled.

The Corporatio­n was threatened with a charge of contempt of court and the prospect of a large fine after it was found to have flouted Freedom of Informatio­n laws.

The ruling is another embarrassm­ent for BBC director general Tim Davie as he attempts to rebuild the Corporatio­n’s reputation in the wake of the Bashir scandal.

Earlier this year, Lord Dyson, a former Supreme Court judge, condemned the ‘deceitful behaviour’ deployed by Bashir to land his 1995 interview with Princess Diana and condemned the BBC for covering up what it knew about his conduct.

Bashir used fake bank statements to gain access to the Princess before telling her a litany of lies and smears.

In December 1995, Diana sent the BBC a handwritte­n note, saying Bashir ‘did not show me any documents, nor give me any informatio­n that I was not previously aware of’. But the note went missing for 25 years and was only rediscover­ed last year.

In his report, Lord Dyson said that in 1996, a member of BBC management had told someone who has never been identified to guard the note ‘with his life’.

The individual took it home and, despite widespread coverage in the media, was apparently not aware of a hunt for the note until early November 2020.

In a bid to shed more light on the mystery, investigat­ive journalist Andy Webb requested in September that, under the Freedom of Informatio­n Act, the BBC release ‘all documents’ related to Diana’s letter. The Corporatio­n failed to respond, despite being under a legal obligation to do so within 20 days.

Last Thursday, the Informatio­n Commission­er’s Office intervened and ruled that the BBC breached section 10 of the Act. It ordered the Corporatio­n to issue a ‘substantiv­e response’ to Mr Webb within 35 days, adding that failure to do so could see the Commission­er, Elizabeth Denham, inform the High

Court and that the breach ‘may be dealt with as a contempt of court.’ The BBC released 119 pages of documents the following morning, most of which are press cuttings about the Bashir scandal and a small number of heavily redacted documents. The Corporatio­n this weekend claimed it tried to send the informatio­n to Mr Webb on November 22 but he had not been able to receive it because of ‘technical difficulti­es’ with the Corporatio­n’s FOI email account.

The documents reveal that Bashir last year told BBC bosses that he was informed in 1995 that the note was going to be kept in a safe. ‘My recollecti­on is that I gave the letter to Steve Hewlett, then editor of Panorama, and he said that it would be stored in the “BBC safe”, which I assumed was in Television Centre,’ he said. ‘Unfortunat­ely, I did not keep a copy – foolishly – and so don’t have it to hand.’

In another email, Fran Unsworth, the BBC’s director of news and current affairs, asked former BBC executive Anne Sloman whether she recalled seeing the Diana note. ‘The short answer is that I have no recollecti­on of a handwritte­n letter from Diana,’ Ms Sloman replied.

Mr Webb said last night: ‘The BBC says it’s now transparen­t and accountabl­e, yet here they are willing to actually break the law to avoid difficult questions.’

The BBC said: ‘A response was sent to Mr Webb on November 22, which he did not receive due to technical difficulti­es... He has now received it.’

 ?? ??
 ?? ?? SCANDAL: Princess Diana and Martin Bashir during the infamous Panorama interview. Right: Diana’s note
SCANDAL: Princess Diana and Martin Bashir during the infamous Panorama interview. Right: Diana’s note

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United Kingdom