The Mail on Sunday

Why have I been told that I need HRT after breaking my ankle?

- Ask Dr Ellie

I RECENTLY broke my ankle in a fall while running. I’m in perfect health otherwise, but have been told that due to my age – I’m in my late 50s – I need HRT to protect against osteoporos­is. The disease doesn’t run through my family, I don’t smoke and have no notable risk factors. Are hormones really needed now?

OSTEOPOROS­IS is a disease that weakens the bones by decreasing their mineral density and mass.

We don’t routinely screen for the condition, so it is often diagnosed after an injury such as this. One in two women and one in nine men above the age of 50 in the UK will suffer a fracture because of it.

If someone has repeated fractures, or if osteoporos­is runs in a patient’s family, doctors might think to look for it. Other warning signs include long-term steroid use, being underweigh­t for long periods or going through an early menopause which reduces the levels of boneprotec­tive oestrogen.

So for someone in their 50s who is in good health, even with an injury but no other problems or warning signs, it wouldn’t be normal to immediatel­y start osteoporos­is treatment or HRT.

If a doctor has concerns they might refer you for a DEXA bone scan, which measures bone mineral density – usually in the hips and the spine. If the bones are thinner than they should be, osteoporos­is is diagnosed.

Alternativ­ely you could be diagnosed with osteopenia, which is the initial stage of bone-loss before full-blown osteoporos­is.

While some people might benefit from HRT or osteoporos­is medication such as alendronat­e – both of which strengthen the bones – others can get away with far simpler strategies.

These included calcium and Vitamin D supplement­s as well as bone-strengthen­ing exercises – the Royal Osteoporos­is Society has great advice on its website (theros.org.uk).

If you have no menopause symptoms or other reason to require HRT, it would not be prescribed just for osteoporos­is.

I AM a 79-year-old woman and have been taking statins for three years after a blood test gave me a cholestero­l reading of seven. My blood pressure was a little high but not enough to need medication. I am not overweight and don’t smoke, although I have had non-progressiv­e multiple sclerosis (MS) since I was 36. Do I need to keep taking statins?

STATINS are prescribed based on an individual’s overall risk of having a heart attack or stroke within the next ten years.

Calculatin­g this risk involves a tool called QRISK. Developed in 2007, the algorithm evaluates cholestero­l levels, blood pressure, weight, blood sugar, age, family history of disease and ethnicity. If this tool detects the risk to be more than ten per cent, we know that offering statins is a good idea to prevent serious problems in the future.

As a consequenc­e of some 20 different measures used to reach that risk score, it means you could have two people with the same cholestero­l level and only one of them might be offered statins.

Someone in their late 70s with a cholestero­l reading of seven already has a high risk of heart disease and strokes. Age is a big factor, and five tends to be the upper limit of normal. Even if blood pressure is regular, combined with the other factors the ten per cent risk threshold may be met for treatment.

People talk a great deal about statins and their side effects, but

the majority of patients have no problems while taking them.

I WAS advised some time ago to eat walnuts because they are high in omega-3 and good for the heart. But I’ve also heard that omega 3 can cause atrial fibrillati­on (AF). Is this true?

OMEGA-3 oils are part of a group of healthy fats which have health benefits – unlike saturated fats, which are linked to obesity and heart disease.

They keep the heart, blood vessels and lungs healthy as well as helping the immune system to ward off disease.

They have also been shown to lower levels of unhealthy fats in the body, prevent blood clots, improve circulatio­n, lower blood pressure and maintain a steady heart rhythm.

All of this reduces the risk of heart attacks and strokes. In Japan, for instance, where diets are rich in these fats, there is a much lower rate of heart disease.

Good sources of omega-3 oils include nuts and seeds – such as walnuts, flaxseeds and rapeseed – and mackerel, sardines and other oily fish. However, some studies have suggested that people who take supplement­s containing more than one gram of omega-3 may be at higher risk of developing AF, a condition which causes the heart to beat with an abnormal rhythm. It is also an establishe­d risk factor of stroke.

The daily recommende­d amount of omega-3 is about 500 milligrams – roughly half of the amount found in standard supplement­s sold in the UK.

Further work is needed to clarify the link, but there is no concrete evidence that people consuming foods containing omega-3 are at risk.

The NHS doesn’t recommend taking omega-3 supplement­s, but instead it should be consumed naturally within your diet to keep levels at the safe amount.

 ?? ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United Kingdom