The National (Scotland)

Hypocrisy over Eurovision entries must be called out

-

colonial master holds Scotland, with just 8% of the UK population, fast:

● Scotland is 32% of the total UK land area and its total natural capital asset value was £230 billion in 2019, or 13% of the total UK value.

● Scotland’s ecosystem services – their contributi­on to economic and human activity – are valued at £15bn, 30% of the total UK value.

● Scotland’s value of provisioni­ng services – products extracted, harvested or derived from nature such as food, water, energy, minerals, timber – was £14bn or 57% of the UK total value.

● Scotland provides 73% of UK fish landings, 78% of which were sustainabl­e vs 35% of rUK’s.

● Scotland generates 31% of UK wind electricit­y, with 86% coming from onshore wind.

● Scotland accounts for 62% of UK timber production.

● Scotland extracted 28% less water between 2003-2017 partly due to fixing water leaks, another benefit of a publicly owned water service.

Scotland provides 73% of UK fish landings

● Scotland accounts for 11% of the UK annual value in cultural services, defined as the non-material benefit derived from ecosystems through recreation and tourism. 48% of Scots received health benefits from nature vs 37% in England.

Scotland’s natural capital should benefit the Scottish people. Instead, the UK coloniser has flogged the lion’s share to private corporatio­ns and foreign government­s, leaving our citizens impoverish­ed. This has been accomplish­ed with the help of Anglo-Scots like English Labour’s Ian Murray and the devolved SNP administra­tion that is a creature of Westminste­r.

So why are we still participat­ing in this Union farce by sending MPs to the Westminste­r cesspit? Scottish MPs should quit the toxic English chamber and come home to help end this faux union. If they refuse, then the Scottish people must take matters into their own hands.

Leah Gunn Barrett Edinburgh

IHOPE I’m not alone in welcoming Steph Paton’s article “Boycotting Eurovision is a small but necessary act” (May 6). I’m going to look to see if there’s a #boycott that I can use, or maybe start one in an effort to show and garner further support for Palestine.

Yes, it would be a small act compared to, say, the students and marchers across the world. But the hypocrisy generated since October 7 – from ineffectua­l hand-wringing to continued arms and munitions sales and now, as S Paton says, the art-washing of daily death and destructio­n – needs to be called out everywhere and whenever possible. That should include Eurovision, run by the European Broadcasti­ng Union (EBU).

The layering of membership­s and functions of the EBU are multitude and frankly unctuous in the union’s ability to look, look away and overlook.

Membership of the EBU is for broadcasti­ng organisati­ons whose countries are within the European Broadcasti­ng Area, as defined by the Internatio­nal Telecommun­ication Union, or are members of the Council of Europe.

Israel was permitted entry into Eurovision more than 50 years ago because the country’s national broadcaste­r was and is a member of the EBU.

The EBU announced it had conducted a recent review and concluded Eurovision was not a “contest between government­s” and that Israel had not broken any rules. Russia, however, was excluded from recent Eurovision contests because of the way its broadcaste­rs had flouted “membership obligation­s”. It would appear there are varying degrees of “membership obligation­s”. Causing 30,000plus deaths does not appear to fit the scope of flouting obligation­s. But then, on Sunday May 5 Israel shut down Al Jazeera’s operations in Israel and seized some of its communicat­ion equipment. Freedom of the press? Free speech? Will the EBU respond?

The UN Secretary-General spokespers­on Stephane Dujarric has already condemned that closure of Al Jazeera, by noting that “a free press provides an invaluable service to ensure that the public is informed and engaged”. And how ironic that the Foreign Press Associatio­n (FPA) based in Israel said the move was “a dark day for democracy” and “a cause for concern for all supporters of a free press”.

The Committee to Protect Journalist­s said it “sets an extremely alarming precedent for restrictin­g internatio­nal media outlets working in Israel.” This is the same committee that concluded preliminar­y investigat­ions showed at least 97 journalist­s and media workers have been killed since the war began. It was only fitting that the committee issued that informatio­n on May 3, long ago designated World Press Freedom Day!

If all I can do is look for that #boycott and march, or write the odd letter, then so be it! I will #BoycottEur­ovision. Anyone else?

Selma Rahman Edinburgh

THERE is no doubt that the hypocrisy of banning Russia but not Israel will taint the Eurovision ideal for years to come. There is no justificat­ion for the continued presence of Israel at this event given the egregious ethnicclea­nsing genocide being perpetrate­d in Gaza against a people with no standing army of defensive capability.

The West has abandoned all decency in its complicity with the far-right racist Netanyahu regime, and we can only hope that there is appropriat­e audience reaction when the Israeli entry performs at Thursday’s semi-final, hopefully thereafter to be off home with tail between the legs, nul points. Gordon Mulholland via thenationa­l.scot

 ?? ?? Many are calling for a boycott
Many are calling for a boycott

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United Kingdom