‘A performative gesture’: Grassroots Yes activists react
THE events of the last few weeks have been tumultuous, for both Scottish politics and the wider independence movement. The end of the Bute House Agreement. The SNP forming a minority government. A new First Minister. And now, the latest development in a long list of shakeups – the role of independence minister has been scrapped.
The role – previously held by Jamie Hepburn – was tasked with advancing the case for Scottish independence across government departments.
However, when the new ministerial team was introduced on Wednesday, the role had been axed, with Swinney arguing in The National that the role’s responsibilities now fall on “all Cabinet secretaries and ministers”.
We spoke to grassroots activists to gather their reaction to there no longer being a minister for independence.
How close does independence feel now? What does this decision say about Swinney’s priorities?
There’s perhaps not as much outrage as you’d expect.
In fact, some activists we spoke to didn’t see much point in the role in the first place.
Instead, some are suggesting that this is a time to reflect on the progress we’re making with independence, and to remember that growing public support for independence starts at the grassroots level.
Gordon MacIntyre-Kemp, founder of Believe in Scotland, called on the new First Minister to personally take on the portfolio of independence minister, and for the continuation of cross-party collaboration on progressing independence.
“We call on John Swinney to state officially that he personally is now the minister for independence going forward. Furthermore, we believe that every government minister and SNP spokespeople should be briefed to make the case for independence at every opportunity and with more consistency than the SNP have managed since 2014,” MacIntyreKemp said.
He added that the SNP should “go all out for independence” at a time when support for independence is high, but support for the SNP is “languishing”.
“Believe in Scotland expects the SNP to maintain its focus on independence as the way to end the damage caused to Scotland’s economy by Brexit by rejoining the EU,” MacIntyre-Kemp continued.
“To end the cost of living crisis and leave the neoliberalism/austerity-led economic approach, shared by all the London-based parties, in the dustbin of failed economic approaches where it belongs and most importantly, invest in the wellbeing of Scotland’s people.”
MacIntyre-Kemp added that he had worked “very closely” with both Swinney and Kate Forbes, the new Deputy First Minister, and said he was looking forward to finding out what their plans were for progressing support for independence.
Meanwhile Logan Unwin, an SNP activist, said: “I think it makes sense the minister for indy role being scrapped. We need to work on building support for indy and I believe the best way to do that is through grassroots activism and good government. This move keeps the two separate and is no bad thing.
“I think indy feels closer than in 2014. However, not as close as we’d want or hope. The world is a very different place at the moment with challenges left right and centre. Indy is not at the forefront of folks’ minds and we need to be honest about this, address the challenges through competent government and show people why indy is necessary.
“John’s leadership slogan was uniting for independence. He’s been a member all his adult life and believes in indy with every fibre of his being. I think dropping the role was an olive branch for cross party working and bringing people together. It does not mean he does not care about independence.”
And Mary McCabe from Pensioners for Independence added: “Creating the post of independence minister was a performative gesture. I don’t recall Jamie Hepburn coming up with new strategies for getting past the UK Govt’s ban on referendums. When he met with pro-indy grassroots groups he came across as passive.
“The post itself was meant to indicate to frustrated indy supporters that the Scottish Government was serious about pursuing indy.
“Similarly, the abolition of the post is to indicate to soft No voters that the Scottish Government won’t prioritise independence over breadand-butter issues.
“Whatever the SNP do, non-party affiliated groups like Pensioners for Independence will carry on fighting for the right to choose our own sovereign governments and keep our own taxes in Scotland.”
This is a condensed version of our Grassroots newsletter. To receive it direct to your inbox, subscribe at www.thenational.scot/newsletters