The Oban Times

Coire Glas: environmen­tal questions unanswered

-

It seems that Scottish Canals has accepted an agreement with SSE on the Coire Glas pump storage scheme (not classified as a renewable) that can be financiall­y lucrative to it (Lochaber Times, October 18).

Scottish Canals would otherwise have been expected to make representa­tions on SSE’s plans to extract more than 23 million tonnes of water and discharge the same every day to Loch Lochy. This has a consequent risk of bank erosion and scarring on the shores of Loch Lochy, with acknowledg­ed effects of many and rapid fluctuatio­ns in loch level on water plants and aquatic invertebra­tes.

Of course, much of the incredible four million tonnes of rock will still have to be taken out by thousands of lorry transports as well as by canal.

There are still many unanswered questions: how does SSE square the fact that it will get paid twice, for generating the electricit­y from the wind farms and also from the pump storage scheme? How much will it recompense the community (businesses and home owners should get personal compensati­on for massive environmen­tal disturbanc­e and it will take 20 years for landscape recovery)?

How exactly will the four million tonnes of rock be disposed of and how is SSE going to ‘remodel’ the landscape at Coire Glas, as it so nicely puts it? Also, how will it will take in 1500 Mw of power continuous­ly to Coire Glas pump storage and also get the electricit­y out?

I wonder if the customers of Scottish Canals will be pleased to see miles of huge pylons from half way up Loch Lochy on the west bank to Fort Augustus. More than one million visitors each year passing on the A82 will see these blighting pylons and also walkers on the Great Glen Way. If SSE does not insist in making this an undergroun­d electricit­y connection to Fort Augustus, then it will be an eyesore in the Great Glen. Jim Treasurer,

Friends of the Great Glen Environmen­tal Group, Fort William.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United Kingdom