The Oban Times

Appeal to save trees as council defends plans

- By Mark Entwistle mentwistle@obantimes.co.uk

Highland Council has defended the planned removal of more than 30 mature native trees as part of its own developmen­t of 37 units of social housing on the site of the former primary school at Zetland Avenue in the Upper Achintore area of Fort William.

Planning committee members approved an applicatio­n for full consent back in July with the condition that the applicant – the council – carried out a survey which identified 24 of the trees as being in either ‘poor condition’ or of ‘low quality’.

A Highland Council spokespers­on told the Lochaber Times: ‘The developmen­t proposals do include the removal of 31 trees but, of these, three are category U (trees unsuitable for retention due to poor condition) and 21 are category C (trees of low quality).’

The spokespers­on added that there was also an approved Landscape Plan which included the planting of 81 standard-sized broadleaf trees, 21 conifers, 227 hedge plants and 472 shrubs as part of the developmen­t.

The council’s forestry officer’s assessment of the proposals deemed the level of tree removals against the proposed tree retentions and new planting to be acceptable.

The 31 trees affected comprise one crack willow, seven silver birch, 11 goat willow, 11 alder and one ash. But resident Kevin Hickman says given the climate emergency, as many mature trees as possible need to be preserved.

‘Highland Council passed the plans for the Upper Achintore site and then the plans were changed with no apparent consultati­on and the trees getting destroyed came about because of the change,’ Mr Hickman claimed.

‘The change was made to accommodat­e a SUDS drainage basin. Why would they need one as there has never been a need for one before? Is it because they are worried that removing the peat will cause flooding if the houses on Cow Hill are built?

‘The large stands of trees should have been incorporat­ed into the plans for the site. Trees are important for capturing and storing carbon, as we all should know by now, so it is inconceiva­ble that they are proposing to cut down these trees when they have declared a climate emergency.

‘Also it is recognised that trees and all of nature are important for our wellbeing, so the residents in the new build will be in a concrete jungle without them.

‘Also birds, insects and mammals call the trees home.’

According to one resident who attended this week’s meeting of the Upper Achintore Regenerati­on Group on Monday, the architect involved in the project agreed to review the fate of several of the trees earmarked for felling but he still felt too many were being designated for removal.

He added: ‘The removal of 31 trees seems excessive. It may be that the council in Lochaber is out of step with regard to current environmen­tal issues and falling behind public opinion and that of residents.

‘The council should have a policy and guidelines on environmen­tal issues and how developmen­t affects sustainabi­lity and the carbon footprint in the Highland.

‘If a policy does exist, it should be made more public – for example, criteria on felling trees and removal of peat for developmen­ts such as at the top of the hill at Upper Achintore.’

 ?? Photograph: Iain Ferguson, alba.photos ?? Protesters objecting to proposals to fell mature trees on the Upper Achintore site.
Photograph: Iain Ferguson, alba.photos Protesters objecting to proposals to fell mature trees on the Upper Achintore site.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United Kingdom