The Oldie

My Oxford blues

Classics don John Davie laments a tragic decline in rigour, language skills and essay-writing, disguised by rampant grade inflation


Until recently, I had the good fortune to teach classics at various Oxford colleges. I retired from teaching at St Paul’s School in London ten years ago. Trinity College, Oxford, kindly gave me a college lectureshi­p, together with the estimable perk of dining at High Table.

I had always believed in the value of classics as an academic discipline. Had it not underpinne­d Bletchley Park? It was sad, therefore, to see students arriving bright-eyed and bushy-tailed but ill-equipped for the course.

The problem, as I knew too well from my experience in schools, was the wretched exam system which set the linguistic bar so low for intelligen­t, inquisitiv­e pupils.

Previously, dons had been able to assume a good knowledge of Latin and Greek in first-year students. The undergradu­ates had read entire A-level texts in the original (the norm is now one-third only) and so could read university texts with some fluency and make a decent fist of prose compositio­n.

Not so now. Translatio­ns are used excessivel­y, along with every trick the internet can provide to paper over cracks in linguistic knowledge.

Oxford students attend remedial classes in basic grammar and syntax, led by postgradua­te students. They rarely appear to benefit, not least because they feel such instructio­n comes too late and is somehow beneath them.

In schools, a new generation of teachers, themselves not strong in the classical languages, are happy to teach the subject as classical civilisati­on/ history rather than as a preparatio­n for reading literary, historical and philosophi­cal texts in the original.

At Oxford, after the first five terms, there is no further linguistic study per se. Students’ essays often lack structure and rigour, because school has not prepared them properly in this skill.

Does this matter? Well, yes, if one is an employer who values the ability to think critically and analyse, marshallin­g facts

logically and producing cogent arguments.

Traditiona­l classics delivered this in spades, combining the humanist discipline­s of history, literature and philosophy with the rigorous mental training of mathematic­s.

The end product was often formidable: MPS would desert the bars and tea rooms of Westminste­r to hear the rhetoric of former classics professor Enoch Powell and Harold Macmillan, who got a First in Classics Mods at Oxford, before the Second World War interrupte­d his degree. Few, if any, now command such interest – even if Boris Johnson got a 2.1 in classics at Oxford.

In universiti­es today, too many Firsts are awarded and Oxford is no exception. Part of the reason is grade inflation, stimulated in response to the market forces of higher-education funding. Genuine excellence is still found and rightly rewarded but someone who works to achieve alphas in all or most of his or her Finals papers receives the same degree as someone who gains alphas in fewer than 70 per cent of them. Excellence needs to be distinguis­hed from mere ability to maintain the incentive to excel.

There is also the political dimension, fostered by the Blairite notion that half of our young people should go to university. The current obsession with accessibil­ity has driven out the idea of the best being educated at our universiti­es.

The parliament­ary constituen­cies of Oxford and Cambridge voted predominan­tly Labour in the recent election. My experience of dons started in the 1970s with my time at Balliol, then under a Marxist Master. Of course, there’s nothing wrong with being left-wing. But that has a knock-on effect on standards, if less is expected of the students.

‘Does it really matter, John?’ a classics don said to me recently, apropos the modern decline in standards. ‘We’re not preparing people to run an empire any more or to sound like Gladstone.’

I think of my (and Boris Johnson’s) old tutor) at Balliol, Jasper Griffin (1937-2019). He did not come from a privileged background but knew the value of hard work and making the most of one’s talent. He is the best example of how it used to be: a scholarshi­p boy, brilliantl­y taught at school and university, becoming the greatest classicist of his generation.

Jasper illuminate­d Greek and Roman life through his sensitive reading of ancient poetry. His literary approach to the Iliad and the Odyssey flung open the dusty rooms of Homeric scholarshi­p, enabling subsequent generation­s to appreciate these epics as supreme poetry.

Is it, then, all doom and gloom for the future? Not if schools stretch their pupils from an early age according to their different abilities, and universiti­es like Oxford respond accordingl­y.

Michael Gove’s reforms are welcome, with their lack of condescens­ion towards the young. But in many schools excellence is still a dirty word, along with competitio­n, and aspiration can wither on the vine.

Aristotle wrote that excellence should become a habit. If we are to achieve what we are capable of as a country, young people (and their instructor­s) need to be encouraged to embrace this ideal from an early age. Above all, children should not have their wings clipped by those who failed to take to the skies themselves.

 ??  ??
 ??  ?? Back to basics: Stan Laurel and Oliver Hardy in A Chump at Oxford (1939)
Back to basics: Stan Laurel and Oliver Hardy in A Chump at Oxford (1939)

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United Kingdom