The Pembrokeshire Herald

Senedd backing for major infrastruc­ture approval changes

- Chris Haines ICNN Senedd reporter

THE SENEDD agreed reforms aimed at streamlini­ng the consenting process for significan­t infrastruc­ture projects in Wales.

MSs passed the infrastruc­ture bill, which will establish a unified process, known as infrastruc­ture consent, for major on and offshore projects.

Infrastruc­ture consent will replace existing procedures for energy, transport, waste, water and gas projects above a certain size or capacity threshold.

Julie James, Wales’ housing, local government and planning secretary, argued the bill will introduce a modern and simplified process.

She said the bill will play an important part in moving towards netzero emissions by 2050 by enabling consent for renewable energy projects in a timely but robust manner.

She told MSs: “Not only will it improve the competitiv­eness of Wales as an attractive place for investment and jobs, it will also empower local communitie­s and other key stakeholde­rs.”

Ms James said it is a “process bill” with much of the detail to follow in secondary legislatio­n and a significan­t amount of work ahead to ensure a smooth implementa­tion process.

She told the chamber that secondary legislatio­n will ensure the infrastruc­ture consenting process operates effectivel­y, efficientl­y and with maximum engagement.

She explained that two consultati­on papers will be issued by late May, with the first focused on pre-applicatio­n consultati­on processes and the second centred on fees.

A third and final consultati­on paper will follow this year outlining the whole new process.

Janet FinchSaund­ers, the Conservati­ves’ shadow secretary, described the reforms as hollow and lacking in fundamenta­l details.

She argued this is in complete conflict with the bill’s core aims of delivering a streamline­d process and empowering communitie­s to engage.

Ms Finch-Saunders warned that the bill is missing a vast amount of details, including on how open-floor hearings will be triggered and time limits for making decisions.

She said: “It is apparent to any reasonable person that this bill does not represent anywhere near what it promises to do, and that is a streamline­d and unified process.

“The reality is that so much informatio­n is omitted that we do not know how these processes are going to work in reality.”

The Aberconwy MS added: “Clearly, the legislatio­n is not as I believe it should be. We do not believe that it delivers a robust process for Wales.”

Delyth Jewell stressed the importance of

nd striking the right balance deliberate­ly not included between tackling the “on the face of the bill”. climate emergency and She said: “If you were safeguardi­ng the natural to put that into primary world. legislatio­n, it would

Plaid Cymru’s deputy become out of date so leader said planning fast that it wouldn’t make processes must be more the end of the year. accessible to the public. “So, it is very

“Too often important that we communitie­s are left put those things in feeling disenfranc­hised and marginalis­ed when decisions about infrastruc­ture are made without their say,” she warned.

Calling for a coalfree future for Wales, Ms Jewell reiterated her party’s calls for coal to be removed from the list of significan­t infrastruc­ture projects in the bill.

The South Wales East MS said: “We will keep pushing for a number of changes in regulation­s. But passing the buck and allowing this bill to fail would be a retrograde step.

“Let this be the first step in a journey towards democratis­ing our planning process. There’s an awful lot more that we need to do, but it can at least start here.”

Ms James reiterated that many details were secondary legislatio­n.”

Before the debate could be held, the King’s consent had to be sought because the bill could impact the Royal Family’s interests, such as the Crown Estate.

MSs agreed the stage-four vote on the final text of the bill, with 36 in favour and 15 against.

The infrastruc­ture bill now enters “post stage four”, a four-week period during which it could be challenged by the UK Government but it is expected to move on to Royal Assent.

 ?? ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United Kingdom