Milford in uproar as boxing event stopped

PRESSURE is mounting on two local councillors who effectively put a stop to a popular charity boxing event in Milford Haven.

Was the boxing event really a problem, was the last one a problem and should it have been stopped? In over a hundred well written comments on the Pembrokeshire Herald Facebook page the answer from the people of Milford Haven is quite obviously No, No, No!

In a licensing subcommittee hearing on Wednesday, which can only be described as a total farce, members were supposed to consider a tiny number of noise complaints brought to their attention by the Authority’s environmental officer Nigel Walters - instead many irrelevant matters regarding The Hangar venue in Thornton were discussed, including licensing policy, fire safety and planning matters - none of which was within the remit of the narrow topic of the hearing.

On May 1, almost certainly following the publication of our article online, Alan Dennison resigned on Companies House website as the director of a licensed venue - also in Milford Haven - and back dated this application to August last year. Following discussion regarding this on social media, the manager of that venue contacted us to say that this was a mistake by their accountant, and was not connected to the complaints made regarding The Hanger. Readers can make up their own minds.

It is the opinion of this newspaper that the two local councillors who have put a stop to an important charity event must now do the right thing. The people of Milford Haven have spoken. Withdraw your complaints, and allow the organisers of the boxing night to obtain their license on appeal at the magistrates court, in fact, write a letter of support. You represent the people, and this is what the people want. PROMOTER TO

APPEAL

THE HANGAR has been operating as an occasional events venue in Milford Haven since last September. Authorisation for the events is granted by the council through temporary event notices. Until recently, the council had consistently issued permissions for events, but today, in County Hall, the Licensing SubCommittee decided to prevent an event, planned for May 31st, from occurring.

The objection was raised by one of the council’s own officers, who stated that the venue has become a public nuisance due to noise complaints received. The role of the councillors on the subcommittee was to examine this single objection and determine whether the noise complaints were substantial enough to justify halting the event. The committee heard from The Hangar’s manager, Steve Bartram, that the event on May 31st, planned as a ‘boxing night’, would inherently be quieter than other events held at the venue.

Speaking for the Council Environmental Officer, David Walters countered that complaints had been received not only in connection with music at the venue but also concerning the ingress and egress of patrons, as well as the noise from vehicles leaving the event. However, when pressed for details, Mr Walters could not provide the committee with a definitive number of complaints received, nor was the nature of the complaints discussed in detail.

Steve Bartram told the council that he believed the complaints were ‘unfounded’ and originated from two councillors, Alan Dennison, who serves on Pembrokeshire County Council, and Milford Haven Town Councillor Nicola Harteveld. The Herald has learned that Councillor Dennison is a director of another licensed venue in Milford Haven.

Emails obtained by this newspaper also reveal that Councillor Dennison lodged an official complaint to Licensing Enforcement last summer, prior to The Hangar’s opening, alleging it was intending on operating without planning permission. However, there is no legal requirement for a venue used temporarily, under temporary event notices for events lasting less than 28 days, to have planning permission. The Herald understands that this was the advice given to The Hangar’s management by council officers just before it started hosting events.

There was a debate in the chamber regarding whether the complaint from Nicola Harteveld represented the view of Milford Haven Town Council or her personal opinion. Steve Bartram contended it was her personal view and not her acting in her official capacity.

This newspaper has verified with Milford Haven Town Council, whose clerk stated that the Town Council had not been notified about the application and therefore had not discussed it.

In fact, the only statutory consultees are the Noise Pollution Officer and the police.

Some of the complaints, the Herald has learned, seem unfounded. Like one complaint about noise from the burger van generator, when it runs off batteries – and another about a noisy car driving past, but no one could confirm it was anything to do with events at the venue.

Before the hearing on Tuesday, Councillor Dennison stated that while he supported the idea of a music venue for Milford Haven, he had ‘concerns’

about the noise levels at The Hangar.

“I was at Nicola Harteveld’s house, as she had called me over. I could clearly hear the noise from inside her house—a booming kind of music. It’s evident that something needed to be done about the sound,” he explained.

“Nicola remarked jokingly that it wouldn’t be so bad if the music were more appealing rather than the repetitive booming we can hear now.”

At the meeting, Steve Bartram earnestly tried to persuade the members to allow the boxing night to proceed, stating, “Since the initial decision to open The Hangar, I have done everything within my power to meet all the licensing objectives, before any work was carried out inside. I also sought guidance from all responsible authorities on my plans and how I intended to manage The Hangar. These included Geraint Griffiths, Nathan Miles, Stuart McDonald, and Nigel Lewis. During these meetings, everything was discussed in detail, outlining the plans and intentions for the event hub.

“Not once was it suggested by any of the responsible authorities that planning permission should have been sought, should it have been necessary at the time, as I have done since receiving the planning enforcement warning letter.

“Regarding the temporary events notices, according to regulations, up to 15 can be issued within a calendar year, and currently, I am well within that limit at nine.

“As part of the planning application, I have had, at substantial cost, noise surveys carried out—one at a scientific ‘pink noise’ survey and another during a ‘dance event’ on Saturday 30th March. I have a 36-page document supporting these findings which confirms that we are operating well within legal noise limits.”

Members of the Licensing SubCommittee, despite being advised to focus solely on the noise issue, questioned The

Hangar’s management on a broad array of topics, including their long-term plans for the venue, why a Full Public Entertainment License had not been applied for, and why planning permission for a change of use for the building had not yet been sought. Bartram explained that a ‘Change of Use Planning Application’ had been submitted on Tuesday 30th April, with the assistance of a planning professional.

Journalists covering the hearing noted that much of the discussion was irrelevant to the issue at hand, which was whether the event proposed for May 31st was likely to cause a public nuisance.

However, the actual event itself was only briefly mentioned, and no substantial details about the complaints, or their number, were provided.

It can only be concluded that the asking relevant questions Licensing Subor having any detailed Committee members understanding of the made their decision to noise complaints at the

nd stop the boxing event venue. on May 31st without After the hearing, the management of The Hangar indicated their intention to appeal to a Magistrates’ Court within 21 days.

Readers should note that the ‘Abba Tribute Night’ planned for May 11th is unaffected by this decision, and the soldout event is still going ahead.