The Peterborough Evening Telegraph

MPs lose out on gay weddings

Politician­s oppose controvers­ial marriage reforms

- Kelly Pipes news@peterborou­gh.co.uk Twitter: @ peterborou­ghtel 01733 588713

MPS for Peterborou­gh and the surroundin­g area have taken a defiant stance against gay marriage, as reforms get the green light from Commons.

Stewart Jackson a nd Shailesh Vara voted against t he Prime Minister and against marriage for same-sex couples, in the House on Tuesday.

They sided with a minority of MP sin rejecting the bill and the Tory leader’s claim that gay marriage was a move towards an equal and stronger society.

The Commons voted by 400 to 175, a majority of 225, to give the Marriage (Same Sex Couples) Bill a second reading.

Peterborou­gh MP Mr Jackson thanked his constituen­ts for their messages of support in the aftermath of the Parliament­ary debate.

Hesaid: “I’m proud tonight I defended free speech, religious freedom and the institutio­n of marriage and kept faith with my conscience and constituen­ts.”

During earlier debates in the House, the Peterborou­gh MP hit back at a comparison made between his opposition to the Bill and racism.

He countered: “Rosa Parks did not refuse to give up her seat on that bus for me to go to the back of the bus as a traditiona­l Christian.

“This government has no right to tell me that my long held traditiona­l theologica­l beliefs can be thrown away in the dustbin on the basis that’s the zeitgeist, let’s all be trendy and have same sex marriage.

“My view is not based on hostility to gay people. I would have in fact supported civil partnershi­ps had I been an MP in 2004.

“However, I believe that the religious definition of the term marriage must be kept between a man and a woman, and as such, the state should not seek to get involved with this legislatio­n which will blur the line between church and state.”

North West Cambridges­hire MP Mr Varas aid: “This is a matter of conscience for me, andit has also been highlighte­d in the views of my constituen­ts who have been in touch.

“I have no problems with civil partnershi­p, but if the definition of marriage is redefined, then I have a number of serious concerns regarding the role of religious institutio­ns such as churches, temples, synagogues and so on.

“Religious groups who oppose gay marriage should be protected against any legal obligation to marry gay couples on their premises.”

Prime Minister David Cameron welcomed the final count, calling it “a step forward for our country”.

 ??  ?? Stewart Jackson MP.
Stewart Jackson MP.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United Kingdom