Kuga is still a leading light

The latest version of Ford’s family SUV continues the march upmarket, writes Steven Chisholm

Sales of new diesel cars are falling, with negative press, scandals such as diesel gate and legislation targeting oil-burning engines all contributing to the slump.

At the same time efficient, turbocharged petrol engines are on the up, picking up the slack while the market slowly gets used to the idea of alternative fuels and the charging infrastructure slowly expands.

Some of the most acclaimed examples of this new breed of turbocharged engine are from Ford’s Ecoboost range.

The 1.5-litre version in our all-wheel-drive Kuga being a prime example. With 178bhp and 240 177lb/ft of low-down grunt it has ample power for this mid-sized SUV which squares up against the VW Tigu an and Kia Sport age in that awkward comes-with-AWD-so-ST-Line not-quite-a-crossover-but-too-car-like-to be-an-off-roader middleground buyers like so much.

Paired with Ford’ s six-speed powershift gearbox it delivers power smoothly around town and is pretty quick to change at higher speeds outside the city too.

A few years ago you’d have been mad to buy a big car like this with anything other than a diesel engine and, while thee co boost unit is a pleasure to drive, you do pay for it in terms of fuel economy. Official figure is 37.7 combined, but I didn’ t reach the 30s in my test.

Ford do great-handling cars very well and, while it’ s tough to make an SUV fall into that category, they’ ve done a decent job with-the-Kuga-and-true-to-form - it’s one of the best handling in its class.

is Ford’s sporty trim level, generally meaning bigger alloys, a body styling kit and touches such a stinted windows. The‘ X’ adds a bit of luxury with even bigger wheels, a panoramic roof, electric ally adjustable and heated seats, powered tailgate and key less entry.

It’s a good-looking car which was refreshed to look more like its larger brother the Edge 18 months ago. The wider grille not only improves pedestrian safety in the event of a collision, but is actually cheaper to replace should you damage it something no buyer is ever likely to consider on the forecourt but good to know nonetheless.

Ordinarily, when we’re sent a car by a manufacturer to test I gloss over the wear and tear the test cars tend to pick up on the test circuit. There’s usually at least a couple of dozen journalists driving each vehicle before it reaches us and it would be unfair to hold the manufacturer responsible for any scrapes or bumps it might pick up along the way.

However I was disappointed to note that two of the rear seat belt catches were broken in a car that was less than eight months old at the time of driving.

That was most likely a fluke, caused by a colleague’s mistreatment, but it’s a first in a Ford test car and not something I expect from a £35,440 model.

And that’s the only other issue I have with this car: the price. It’s great to drive, has bags of equipment and looks good but so is a Kia Sportage, which is £5 kc heap erin the equivalent GT-S specification.

In the old days, Ford could rely on superior build quality but, in the areas that matter, brands like Kia have caught up. Ford must be careful not to price their models too steeply against the improving competition.

The Kuga handles better than the Sportage, but there’s better value than the ST-Line X in the Kuga line-up.