The Press and Journal (Aberdeen and Aberdeenshire)

Big-spending

- BY DANIEL O’DONOGHUE WESTMINSTE­R REPORTER

Sajid Javid and John McDonnell have launched an election spending war which will lead to major increases in borrowing whoever wins the vote.

Both politician­s, who are battling for the keys to Number 11 Downing Street and control of the Treasury, abandoned their parties’ previous fiscal rules in keynote speeches yesterday.

Chancellor Mr Javid first pledged to invest £100 billion in roads, rail, broadband and infrastruc­ture over the next five years as part of a “decade of renewal”.

In a rival speech Mr McDonnell went further, promising that Labour will invest “on a scale never seen before in this country”.

Speaking in Liverpool Mr McDonnell unveiled plans for an extra £150 billion worth of borrowing to “upgrade and expand our schools, hospitals, care homes and council houses”.

He also vowed to “shift the centre of political gravity” away from London.

He said: “Our aim as a Labour government is to achieve what past Labour government­s have aspired to. An irreversib­le shift in the balance of power and wealth in favour of working people.

“That means change, which means investment on a scale never seen before in this country and certainly never seen before in the north and outside of London and the south-east.

“To achieve that objective also requires therefore an irreversib­le shift in the centre of gravity in political decision making and investment in this country from its location solely in London into the north and regions and nations of our country.”

Mr McDonnell concluded by saying that after “nearly a decade of harsh, brutal and unnecessar­y austerity cuts on our community”, voters would not be taken for “fools” at the Tory “stunt offers of spending more”.

But Mr Javid attacked Labour’s investment plans, accusing the party of wanting to “spray money round like confetti” and indulging in “fantasy economics”.

He said the “transforma­tion” in the economy since the Conservati­ves took power “was not the result of

 ?? ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United Kingdom