The Press and Journal (Aberdeen and Aberdeenshire)

Decommissi­oning security for offshore wind projects poses serious questions

- CALUM CRIGHTON ■ Calum Crichton is a partner who heads the oil and gas/energy team at Gilson Gray advising oil and gas majors to SMEs.

Financial security in relation to decommissi­oning oil and gas installati­ons has long been a hot topic for our industry. Examples of energy companies defaulting on decommissi­oning responsibi­lities due to insolvency are not uncommon.

The Petroleum Act 1998 “section 29” regime in the UKCS and the selfgovern­ing nature of Decommissi­oning Security Agreements that have become commonplac­e seem to have limited that possibilit­y in our oil and gas sector.

Offshore wind regime

The offshore wind decommissi­oning regime is governed by the Energy Act 2004 and whilst containing similar principles, there are key difference­s.

Whilst the section 29 regime attempts to keep every (petroleum) licensee past and present “on the hook” for decommissi­oning, the 2004 Act regime allows BEIS/ Scottish Ministers to keep previous (offshore wind) developers/owners “on the hook” until required securities have been fully accrued.

The net result appears to be the same. The total amount of security will be the estimated decommissi­oning cost. However, the Government will not have the same access to past owners as it does under the section 29 regime, opening up the possibilit­y to offload assets to less financiall­y secure buyers. Uncertaint­y in cost estimates

Like the oil and gas industry, the difficulty in arriving at an accurate cost estimate poses further risk. There are several unknowns, which increase that uncertaint­y. It is true that Power Purchase Agreements provide offshore wind projects with a greater degree of certainty over longer-term revenues, reducing the uncertaint­y associated with end of life revenues that oil and gas projects “enjoy”. Further, an offshore wind farm will be host to a sea of identical turbines, reducing uncertaint­y in stark contrast to, for example, an array of offshore wells.

However, many projects will be being decommissi­oned in a very different landscape as we approach the UK’s net zero commitment­s in 2045 and 2050. Nobody knows what that will mean for vessel cost and availabili­ty. Nobody can accurately predict the decommissi­oning cost of offshore wind projects and many fear that estimates are too low another piece of the puzzle that has large similariti­es as historic oil & gas decommissi­oning estimates proved too light.

A major difference being that (offshore wind) owners/developers develop the cost estimates

However, many projects will be being decommissi­oned in a very different landscape as we approach the UK’s net zero commitment­s in 2045 and 2050

informing levels of security required. Whilst this is the same fundamenta­l principle in oil and gas Decommissi­oning Security Agreements, that cost estimate is heavily scrutinise­d by the “Second Tier Participan­ts” and can be reviewed and determined by an expert.

There are both similariti­es and difference­s between the regimes but the key point is that both face challenges in accurately predicting costs and providing adequate financial security.

 ?? ??
 ?? ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United Kingdom