The Press and Journal (Aberdeen and Aberdeenshire)

It’s 1997 again, as we witness the Tories implode in chaos

Tory conveyor belt of dire prime ministers is coming to a messy and mutinous end

- Chris Deerin ■ Chris Deerin is a leading journalist and commentato­r who heads independen­t, non-party thinktank, Reform Scotland

In its 124 years of existence, starting with Ramsay MacDonald and running through to Gordon Brown, the Labour Party has provided the UK with six prime ministers.

Were the Conservati­ves to dump Rishi Sunak before the next general election – a far from unthinkabl­e prospect – there will have been six Tory PMs since 2010 alone.

This is not a mark of Conservati­ve success, but of an internal psychodram­a that, ever since the Brexit referendum, has tumbled Britain along in its wake, much like a surfer trapped in a giant wave’s undertow.

The narrow Yes to Brexit in 2016 was not, it turns out, a final answer to anything, but rather the firing of a starting pistol in a battle for the Tory soul between a baffling array of moderates, ideologues and extremists. And while a moderate may currently occupy Number 10, it’s not at all clear that he’s in charge of the office or the agenda, or that his party isn’t about to be seized by some fairly grisly characters.

For those of us old enough to remember the 1997 election, there are clear echoes of history. A weakened prime minister facing an opposition miles ahead in the polls, with defeat a certainty, only its scale to be decided. An ungovernab­le ruling party in which any semblance of order has broken down, with rebels free to shoot their mouths off about who would make a better leader and which increasing­ly crazy policies would somehow turn the electoral deficit around – making everything gradually worse, and ejection from office ever more inevitable.

If Keir Starmer’s Labour lacks the slick appeal and excitement of the Tony Blair era, the Tories don’t even match up to John Major’s hapless crew. A poll by Ipsos UK has found that Major, he of the grey underpants and the squeaky voice, is regarded by considerab­ly more voters as having been a strength to his party than is Sunak. The same is true when Ken Clarke is compared to Jeremy Hunt, Michael Heseltine to Oliver Dowden, Michael Portillo to Grant Shapps.

There are a few reasons for this, I think. One is that the UK was not immune to the tide of disenchant­ment with the elites and the rise of populism that swept the West following the financial crash in the late 2000s.

Installing the extravagan­tly unfit Boris Johnson in Downing Street was merely the most egregious example of a country that had lost touch with its values and dignity. We are locked into an identity politics that is torturing our culture to death, the extremists on both sides tightening the screws whenever it suits their agenda.

Brexit was a spasm of rejectioni­sm, a grenade launched into the heart of politics-as-usual. There was no clear plan for what would follow, as can be seen from the drunken stagger that has defined Britain’s economic policy ever since. This has coincided with a technologi­cal revolution that is uprooting long traditions of how things have been done, and has brought with it an unnerving sense of instabilit­y, amid a world that is a noisy competitio­n between global powers, both economic and military. Solutions are far from obvious.

And, yet, there are Tories at Westminste­r who insist they know exactly what to do. Double down on Brexit, slash this and that tax, strike an advantageo­us trade deal here and there, quit the ECHR, get utterly ruthless on immigratio­n, embrace the idea of the return of Donald Trump to the White House, stick a flinty right-winger in Downing Street. Mission complete. Humility wholly absent.

Had Sunak rather than Johnson been made PM in 2019, I suspect the Conservati­ves would be in a better place today. He likely wouldn’t have conducted witch trials of MPs who were less than fully signed up to a hard-line departure from the EU. He wouldn’t have ripped up convention­s and rules in an attempt to undermine Parliament, as Johnson did repeatedly.

The government and the party would have a better balance. After 14 years, it would still deserve to lose, but it might not look quite so ready for the knacker’s yard.

As it is, Sunak is reduced to threatenin­g a June general election that he doesn’t really want, in order to call his fractious and conspiring MPs, many if not most of whom stand to lose their seats, to heel.

While Starmer may not have the pop-star glitz of Blair, and while the tight economic settlement he will inherit will heavily restrict his ability to repair the neglected national fabric in the short term, the polls show us that none of that matters to voters.

Britain has had enough of a conveyor belt of weak and/or bad prime ministers, of being treated as a Tory plaything, of being an experiment for untested, Trump-lite, right-wing theory.

Whenever the election is called, the Conservati­ves are heading for defeat on a seismic scale. They are the authors of their own misfortune.

Brexit’s rejectioni­sm launched a grenade into politics-as-usual

 ?? ?? TURNOVER: There have been six Labour premiers since 1924, but six Tory PMs just since 2010, as the party is in continuous chaos.
TURNOVER: There have been six Labour premiers since 1924, but six Tory PMs just since 2010, as the party is in continuous chaos.
 ?? ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United Kingdom