The Press and Journal (Inverness, Highlands, and Islands)

Farage’s Brexit remorse shows the folly of separatism and fruitless sovereignt­y gains

- John Ferry ≤ John Ferry is a regular commentato­r on Scottish politics and economics, a contributo­r to think tank These Islands, and finance spokespers­on for the Scottish Liberal Democrats

It was the most extraordin­ary admission. Speaking on Newsnight last week, Nigel Farage, a man who has dedicated his political career to seeing Britain cut its links with the EU, accepted that the “leave” project has not turned out the way he had envisaged.

“Brexit has failed,” said Farage. The presenter had just pointed out that a poll from last month showed 53% of Brits say Brexit was wrong, that around one in five leave voters regret their decision, and that the Office for Budget Responsibi­lity forecasts a 4% hit to the British economy over the medium to long term on the back of Brexit.

“We haven’t actually benefited from Brexit economical­ly, when we could have done,” said Farage.

The problem is not with Brexit itself, you see, but rather the cack-handed way in which politician­s who lack Farage’s zeal have implemente­d it. There was no recognitio­n at all that Britain opting to end open trading with its biggest and closest markets was only ever going to be economical­ly damaging, no matter who is charged with seeing it through.

The sunlit uplands of independen­ce have turned out to be dreich wetlands, but that reality is simply dismissed as being a fault in the implementa­tion process, rather than a fundamenta­l and systemic problem with the plan.

Farage’s search for scapegoats and excuses was a neat reminder of what happens when we let nationalis­t ideologues driven by misguided notions of pure sovereignt­y take us down a path of separation and division. It never works out the way they promised it would.

Watching his interview, I was struck by the thought of Alex Salmond sitting in the same chair in, say, 2018, making his excuses for the failure of his own Scottish independen­ce project. If Salmond had convinced enough of us to vote for his revolution in 2014, then the big day for formally cutting away from the UK would have taken place in March 2016.

Make no mistake, it would have been a disaster. The Salmond-Sturgeon 2014 independen­ce prospectus was sold on the basis that Scotland’s structural fiscal deficit would be mitigated by ongoing multibilli­on-pound annual tax receipts from the North Sea. The reality in 2016 was oil revenues going into negative territory for the first time.

A recent study has highlighte­d the folly of separatism as a policy driver. In February, respected independen­t economist Richard Marsh (who undertook research on behalf of Nicola Sturgeon’s Sustainabl­e Growth Commission, and who is a member of two Scottish Government expert groups advising on statistics and modelling) produced a report in which he demonstrat­ed that a Scottish exit from the UK would lead to Scotland’s economy shrinking by at least 10%, with a quarter of a million job losses.

Having cut Scotland away from its inplace currency and tax base, the government of the new state would have no choice but to accept big cuts in public spending, even if partly offset by tax rises. This would hit Scotland’s most deprived communitie­s hardest.

Overall, nearly 90,000 jobs would be under threat across public services, including local government, education, health, social care and residentia­l care.

The study shows that areas less reliant on public sector employment for prosperity would still experience significan­t job market contractio­n.

Aberdeensh­ire’s economy would stand to lose nearly 5% of employment just through new barriers to trade, closely followed by Edinburgh and Glasgow. There would be an estimated 17,000 jobs lost in Aberdeen.

You have to wonder if politician­s like Alex Salmond, Nicola Sturgeon and, now, Humza Yousaf are secretly glad they didn’t win independen­ce in 2014. Imagine any one of them sitting in the Newsnight hot seat, being confronted with those numbers after they had become a real-life consequenc­e of their separation project.

No doubt they, like Farage, would look for scapegoats and, like him, refuse to accept that economic separation was always destined to fail. Let’s hope they never end up in that hot seat.

 ?? ??
 ?? ?? The Brexit prophet, Nigel Farage.
The Brexit prophet, Nigel Farage.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United Kingdom