The Scots Magazine

The End Of An Era

Scottish clans were divided and fought on both sides of the battle, but all ultimately paid the price

- By DAVID C. WEINCZOK

WITHIN and between clans, the reasons why the people of Scotland chose to fight for or against Charles Stuart and the Jacobite cause were complex.

Clan obligation­s, political philosophi­es, religion, personal loyalties, pro- and anti-union sentiment, family dynamics and many more factors were all at play here, making Jacobitism an intensely personal allegiance.

Many, however, would simply have followed their chieftains, who were well aware that the clan system was steadily fading and hoped that backing Charles Stuart’s cause would prolong it.

The total fighting strength of the Highland clans in 1745 is estimated at 30,000 men. Yet, only 6000 stood alongside Charles at Culloden, demonstrat­ing that clan support for the Jacobites in 1745-46 was far from universal.

As ever, clan Campbell was foremost among those fighting for the government side. John Campbell, Earl of Loudoun, organised recruitmen­t and saw Culloden as a chance to settle old scores against the Macleans, Camerons, and Stewarts. Other clans in the government army included clans Grant, Gunn, Mackay, Munro, Ross, and Sutherland.

These Highland regiments wore the kilt and plaid and fought with dirk, musket, and broadsword just like their Jacobite counterpar­ts. To distinguis­h themselves from Jacobites, they wore badges of myrtle and a red or yellow saltire on their bonnets, in contrast with Jacobites’ distinctiv­e white cockades.

The vast majority of clansmen formed the Jacobite’s front line, where the heaviest losses were taken. While this account is not exhaustive, on the right were the Atholl men, including clans Robertson, Menzies, Rattray, and

Clan support for the Jacobites in 1745-46 universal” was far from

Mercer. To their left stood the Camerons of Lochiel, Stewarts of Appin, Clans Maclaren and Murray, and Lord Lovat’s Frasers.

Branches of the Clan Chattan confederat­ion formed the centre, including Farquharso­ns, Macgillivr­ays, Macleans, Macleods, and Maclachlan­s. Then came men of Edinburgh and Strathspey, and to their left were clan Chisholm, the Macdonalds of Clanranald, Keppoch, and Glengarry, a few Mackenzies of Seaforth, and Grants of Glen Urquhart and Glenmorist­on.

But the second line barely participat­ed.

The Atholl men and Clan Chattan were first to charge, while the Macdonalds reeled and refused to advance into near-certain death. Almost none of the Highlander­s that broke through the government front line survived to tell of their bravery.

Several chieftains fell, such as Alexander Macdonald of Keppoch who spurred the Macdonalds into action but was shot twice before reaching the enemy lines, and Lochiel, who had his ankles broken by canister within a few yards of the government lines.

It wasn’t the battle itself that ended the clan system, but the systemic changes that followed it. The Disarming Act of 1746 forbade Highlander­s from carrying weapons and ended the right of chiefs to demand military service.

Chieftains could no longer execute the law within their own domain, something that had always defined their authority. The estates of 40 Jacobite leaders were confiscate­d by the Crown, reducing chiefs to mere landlords. Individual leaders were pursued long after the battle.

The patriarcha­l, kin-based relationsh­ip between chief and clan was utterly severed, replaced by a centralise­d power in London.

Such forces, more than any bullet fired across Culloden Moor, ended the age of the clan.

 ??  ?? The Battle of Culloden
The Battle of Culloden
 ??  ?? Earl of Loudoun
Earl of Loudoun
 ??  ??
 ??  ?? Clan graves at Culloden
Clan graves at Culloden

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United Kingdom