The Scotsman

More options

-

JACK Hamilton (letters, 22 March) is wrong: the one referendum question gives us two options. We can vote either for independen­ce or for the status quo.

But there is a very real bias hidden in the one simple question. A large number of voters do not want either independen­ce or the status quo – they want more devolution within a UK framework. But that third option will not be on the referendum ballot paper.

So how are those voters going to vote? They will be forced to choose an option they do not want. That is the real bias.

That is why the result of the referendum will be neither “clear” nor “decisive”.

James Gilmour East Parkside

Edinburgh

I DO hope the large photo opportunit­y sign for the First Minister and his deputy (your report, 22 March) was paid for by the SnP and not the taxpayer.

John a DorwarD Brechin Road

Arbroath THe welcome announceme­nt of the referendum date in the Scottish Parliament was marred by the mean-spirited and trivial contributi­on by Johann lamont and other labour Party members. Whatever your view of independen­ce, the debate will be won by positive and dignified discussion of Scotland’s future.

It seems that we will have to wait a long time to hear any constructi­ve statements about the developmen­t of Scotland’s economy from labour, Conservati­ve and liberal Democrats, who are constraine­d in what they can promise the Scottish people because of the punishing economic approach of the current

Westminste­r Government. They seem to be stuck in an uncomforta­ble place where all they can offer is negativity and insults about the pro-independen­ce campaign.

What working people in Scotland are to make of this it is difficult to predict.

But the threats of further public sector cuts and the pay restraints on civil servants sends out a message to those who are most vulnerable.

I am sure that the trade unions will draw their own conclusion­s.

For lamont to throw in personal insults about the First Minister’s “pomposity” “and self-aggrandise­ment” lowers the level of debate at a time when the world is watching with great interest.

It is particular­ly disappoint­ing when she herself refuses to state her position on the removal of Trident from Scotland.

I am with Independen­t MSP Margo MacDonald, who said: “let’s have the debate the Scottish people deserve.”

maGGie cheTTy Woodend Drive

Glasgow

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United Kingdom