The Scotsman

Common energy goals will focus market

- Philip White looks at how new legislatio­n will impact both landlords and tenants Philip White is partner for energy and sustainabi­lity services at Malcolm Hollis LLP

Next month the Assessment of Energy Performanc­e of Non-domestic Buildings (Scotland) Regulation­s 2016 come into force.

The legislatio­n is being implemente­d by the Scottish Government to improve the energy performanc­e of buildings Scotland.

It sets out requiremen­ts on building owners for the assessment and improvemen­t of the carbon and energy performanc­e of their buildings.

In most instances, if the building is greater than 1000m2 and constructe­d before 2002, owners will need an action plan detailing potential energy performanc­e improvemen­ts and the measures required to meet those targets, before the property can be sold or let to a new tenant.

Property owners can action the suggested improvemen­ts or alternativ­ely defer the work by producing a Display Energy Certificat­e (DEC).

Both the action plan and the DEC will be stored on an electronic register available to the public.

This approach to energy performanc­e legislatio­n seems more sensible than the English equivalent.

It is still the landlord’s responsibi­lity but by linking requiremen­ts to the DEC rather than the Energy Performanc­e Certificat­e, there is a clear visibility to operationa­l performanc­e of a building.

As a result, both landlords and tenants are focused on a common energy performanc­e goal.

Initial compliance requiremen­ts are relatively light touch, but the Scottish Government has indicated this will be made more stringent as time goes on.

However, landlords would be wise not to overlook the new regulation and should prepare a strategy to collaborat­e with tenants.

While the new regulation should be welcomed by the industry as a measure to improve energy performanc­e, it is likely to have an impact on the value of properties.

For instance, the action plan will include a detailed breakdown of the required improvemen­t measures, which may be readily costed and used by a savvy buyer to negotiate a lower purchase price.

If a rental property cannot be let, its value will decrease to approximat­ely the cost of the required improvemen­t measures.

The loss in value could be significan­t to the landlord, particular­ly if substantia­l works are needed.

The landlord may also incur a loss of rent if the premises have to be vacated while the works are carried out.

Loss of value in the property is also a risk for lenders.

A negative impact on the asset value may lead to an increased loan to value ratio, while a possible loss of rent through increased void periods, expected while improvemen­ts are carried out, may lead to the borrower defaulting on their loan.

There is also the potential for increased borrowing by the property owner in order to pay for the improvemen­ts required. These perceived risks may lead to lenders becoming more robust in their due diligence process, and more likely to implement risk strategies ahead of funds being released.

We all have a part to play in engaging with the trend for greater energy performanc­e.

While it is good that the measures will bring greater focus to energy performanc­e and the carbon emissions in existing commercial buildings for both landlords and tenants, it is important that property owners and landlords understand the full impact of these changes on their properties both in the short and long term.

 ??  ?? 0 The carbon and energy performanc­e of a building comes under greater scrutiny next month
0 The carbon and energy performanc­e of a building comes under greater scrutiny next month
 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United Kingdom