The Scotsman

Firefighte­rs banned from driving ambulances in row over insurance

● Emergency services still to agree on drivers

- By ALASTAIR DALTON

Fire chiefs have been criticised after they banned firefighte­rs from driving ambulances to enable paramedics to continue treating casualties.

The restrictio­n comes despite the Scottish Ambulance Service saying it could authorise anyone with the correct licence to drive its vehicles. It followed a firefighte­r driving an ambulance to hospital in Shetland while two paramedics treated other victims of a road crash.

John Gold, 50, who suffered multiple injuries including a collapsed lung, said the firefighte­r had saved his life, and outlawing the practice was “nonsense”.

However, the Scottish Fire and Rescue Service (SFRS) said firefighte­rs were not allowed to drive ambulances because they were not trained or insured to do so.

Mr Gold, a taxi driver, was taken to the Gilbert Bain Hospital in Lerwick after a head-on collision in August in which his two passengers were also hurt.

He said: “What does it have to come to? Does somebody have to die before they realise? The emergency services up here help each other out.

“I heard the ambulance man saying, ‘Is there anyone who can drive the ambulance for us’, because he and the other paramedic had to stay there because there were another three casualties.

0 Taxi driver John Gold recovering in hospital after the road crash in Shetland

“Then he said, ‘It’s alright, one of the firefighte­rs is coming, he’s going to drive it in’.

“To me, that was a godsend. I was the one who was going to die if they couldn’t do it.”

Shetland Liberal Democrat MSP Tavish Scott said: “A trained driver for any one of our emergency services is trained and profession­al.

“I am amazed and puzzled as to why driving a vehicle to save lives would be banned. That looks wrong and I will be asking ministers to explain.”

Highlands and Islands Conservati­ve MSP Jamie Halcro Johnston said: “It’s important, particular­ly in a place like Shetland which has dispersed and remote communitie­s, that people feel they can take similar action in future if required.

“When lives are at stake, flexibilit­y like this is essential.”

A Scottish Ambulance Service spokesman said: “If there is a clinical need for two of our crew members to be in the back of an ambulance with a patient en route to hospital, any person with an appropriat­e licence, and the authority of our clinicians, can drive the vehicle. The service fully insures any driver who is driving with our authority and holds a current valid driving licence for the vehicle.”

However, SFRS assistant chief officer Lewis Ramsay said: “Our firefighte­rs are neither trained nor insured to drive ambulances. The SAS states it is prepared to insure and underwrite any loss, but we have not been asked to meet to formalise a joint nationally-agreed position.

“They are, however, trained and equipped to ride in the rear of an ambulance and render medical assistance … our firefighte­rs can and will assist in the rear of the ambulance to allow a member of the ambulance crew to drive.”

 ?? PICTURE: CASCADE NEWS ??
PICTURE: CASCADE NEWS

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United Kingdom