The Scotsman

Think Trump is losing? Think again

The US president’s approval rating may be low, but prosperity trumps morality, writes Bret Stephens

- HAVE YOUR SAY scotsman.com

Take a walk with me, dear reader, into the yard, down the street – anywhere, really, just so that we can step outside of our house of outrage. It’s a roomy house, with space for everyone from woke progressiv­es to disillusio­ned conservati­ves. It’s a good house, filled with people united in a just and defiant cause. It’s a harmonious house, thrumming with the sound of people agreeing vigorously. And lately, we’ve started to believe we’re … winning.

We breathed a sigh of relief on Tuesday night when Roy Moore went to his well-earned political death, like Jack Nicholson’s Joker at the end of Batman.

We roared when Robert Mueller extracted a guilty plea from a co-operative Michael Flynn, and the investigat­ive noose seemed to tighten around president Donald Trump’s neck. We cheered when Democrat Ralph Northam trounced Ed Gillespie after the Republican took the low road with anti-immigrant demagogy.

It’s all lining up. Democrats have an 11-point edge over Republican­s in the generic congressio­nal ballot. The president’s approval rating is barely scraping 37 per cent. Nearly six in ten Americans say the United States is on the “wrong track”. Isn’t revenge in 2018 starting to taste sweet – and 2020 even sweeter?

Don’t bet on it. Democrats are making the same mistakes Republican­s made when they inhabited their own house of outrage, back in 1998.

You remember. The year of the wagged finger and the stained blue dress. Of a president who abused women, lied about it, and used his power to bomb other countries so he could distract from his personal messes.

Of a special prosecutor whose investigat­ion oversteppe­d its original bounds. Of half the country in a moral fever to impeach. Of the other half determined to dismiss sexual impropriet­ies, defend a democratic­ally elected leader and move on with the business of the country.

Oh, also the year in which the Dow Jones industrial average jumped by 16 per cent, the unemployme­nt rate fell to a 28-year low, and Democrats gained seats in Congress. Bill Clinton, as we all know, survived impeachmen­t and left office with a strong economic record and a 66 per cent approval rating.

If nothing else, 1998 demonstrat­ed the truth of the unofficial slogan on which Clinton had first run for president: It’s the economy, stupid. Prosperity trumps morality. The wealth effect beats the yuck factor. That may not have held true in Moore’s defeat, but it’s not every day that an alleged paedophile runs for office. Even so, he damn well nearly won. The year 1998 also showed that, when it comes to sex, we Americans forgive easily; that, when it comes to women, we don’t always believe readily; and that, when it comes to presidents, we want them to succeed. However else one might feel about Mueller – or, for that matter, Ken Starr – nobody elected them to anything.

Which brings us back to Trump. Democrats may like their polling numbers, but here are a few others for them to consider.

The first is 3.3 per cent, last quarter’s annual growth rate, the highest in three years. Next is 1.7 per cent, the core inflation rate, meaning interest rates are unlikely to rise very sharply.

Also, 4.1 per cent, the unemployme­nt rate, which is down half a percentage point, or nearly 800,000 workers, since the beginning of the year. Finally, 24 per cent, which is the rise in the Dow Jones industrial average since Trump became president – one of the market’s best performanc­es ever.

Democrats will find plenty of ways to explain that these numbers aren’t quite as good as they sound (they are not) or that we’re setting ourselves up for a big crash (we might well be) or that the deficit is only getting bigger (it is, but so what?).

Politicall­y speaking, none of that matters. Trump enters 2018 with a robust economy that will, according to the estimate of the nonpartisa­n joint committee on taxation, grow stronger thanks to the tax bill.

What about the outrage over the president’s behaviour? Kirsten Gillibrand and other Senate Democrats have called on Trump to resign following new accusation­s of sexual harassment and assault. Good luck getting him to agree. Tom Steyer and other liberal plutocrats want the president impeached and thrown out of office. Good luck electing 67 Democrats to the Senate.

Every minute wasted on that whale hunt is a minute the Democrats neglect to make an affirmativ­e case for themselves.

Which leaves us with Mueller. All of us in the house of outrage are eager for the special counsel to find the goods on the president and Russia, obstructio­n, financial shenanigan­s, anything. The clues seem so obvious, the evidence so tantalisin­gly close.

Yet we should also know that the wish tends to be the father of the thought. What if Mueller comes up short in finding evidence of collusion? What if the worst Mueller’s got is one bad tweet that, maybe, constitute­s evidence of obstructio­n? And what if further doubts are raised about the impartiali­ty of the investigat­ion?

The president’s opponents have made a huge political bet on an outcome that’s far from clear. Anything less than complete vindicatio­n for our side may wind up as utter humiliatio­n.

Dear reader, I too live in the house of outrage, for all the usual reasons. Just beware, beware of growing comfortabl­e in it. As in 1998, it just might turn out to be a house of losers.

 ??  ??
 ??  ?? There may be calls to impeach Donald Trump, but the economic figures are in his favour
There may be calls to impeach Donald Trump, but the economic figures are in his favour
 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United Kingdom