The Scotsman

If you hold people’s data, keep it safe, or new rules could cost you a packet

Graeme Watson warns organisati­ons about a change in the law

-

BBC News recently highlighte­d a stark example of a failure to protect sensitive data. The DVLA sent a letter about a driving licence to “multiple sclerosis Caron Garrod”. Ms Garrod was justifiabl­y offended by the insensitiv­e title and horrified that her medical condition had been divulged through the postal system.

The DVLA has apologised and promised an urgent inquiry. Our amateur sleuths wonder if someone used auto-replace to change MS to multiple sclerosis – but the unintended consequenc­e was that Ms Garrod became multiple sclerosis Garrod.

Something had obviously gone awry at the DVLA and the disclosure was clearly unintentio­nal. Howev- er, a simple administra­tive error like this can have grave ramificati­ons. Under the Data Protection Act 1988 (DPA), medical informatio­n is classed as “sensitive personal data” and organisati­ons that hold such data have a duty to protect it. There are strict rules under the DPA about its processing and security. Those rules will become even stricter in May, when the General Data Protection Regulation­s (GDPR) replace the DPA.

The way society generates and handles data has changed immeasurab­ly since the DPA was drafted in 1988. The GDPR is the biggest change to data protection in 20 years and will bring the law up to date. The core themes under the new regime will be the same, but there are new

obligation­s that organisati­ons which handle personal data, including medical informatio­n, will need to be aware of and prepare for.

If Ms Garrod’s letter had been sent after the GDPR came into force, the DVLA would have had to report itself to the Informatio­n Commission­er’s Office. It will become mandatory to report a personal data breach within 72 hours to the supervisin­g authority. The GDPR defines a personal data breach as: “A breach of security leading to the accidental or unlawful destructio­n, loss, alteration, unauthoris­ed disclosure of, or access to, personal data transmitte­d, stored or otherwise processed.”

Any breach which is likely to result in a risk to the rights and freedoms of individual­s must be reported. The report must describe the nature of the breach and detail those affected, the likely consequenc­es and the measures taken to address or mitigate the effects. Accidental disclosure of personal data, as happened here, will amount to a breach.

An organisati­on that fails to report runs the risk of a significan­t penalty. An administra­tive fine can be imposed of up to 10 million Euros, or 2 per cent of worldwide annual turnover, whichever is higher. An administra­tive error that leads to an accidental disclosure could have dire financial consequenc­es, particular­ly for smaller organisati­ons.

If your business or organisati­on handles personal data (and almost all do), the GDPR will apply to you. Organisati­ons that handle sensitive medical informatio­n need to be especially diligent. It is vital that you make sure you are fully aware of the guidelines your organisati­on should follow, in order to be compliant with the new regulation­s, in advance of their arrival. Graeme Watson is a partner at Clyde & Co.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United Kingdom