The Scotsman

US ‘torture flights’ may have been in Scotland

Investigat­ion into a possible extraordin­ary rendition flight at Prestwick ended in odd exchange on tarmac

- By PARIS GOURTSOYAN­NIS

A public inquiry has been demanded after it was revealed Scottish police officers were stopped from checking whether a US flight at Prestwick Airport contained torture program detainees.

A report found the UK tolerated “inexcusabl­e” treatment of detainees by the US following the 9/11 terror attacks.

Police Scotland officers were blocked from boarding a US government flight at Prestwick Airport to check whether it was carrying detainees as part of America’s secret torture and interrogat­ion programme, a report has found.

The report by the Intelligen­ce and Security Committee (ISC) at Westminste­r found that the UK tolerated “inexcusabl­e” treatment of detainees by the US during the war on terror following the 9/11 attacks in 2001.

The SNP, Labour and the Liberal Democrats all called for a public inquiry into what British spies knew of the US rendition and torture programme.

Revelation­s have since shed thrown light on a network of “black sites” around the world where suspects were held and tortured by US intelligen­ce agencies, as well a web of secret flights transporti­ng detainees into captivity, including at Guantanamo Bay.

In 2013, Police Scotland opened an investigat­ion into whether criminal offences were committed when flights stopped at Scottish airports on at least six occasions.

MPS and peers said it was “beyond doubt” that British intelligen­ce agencies knew at an early stage that the US was mistreatin­g detainees, and said “more could have been done” to change US behaviour.

However, the report found no “smoking gun” suggesting officers carried out or deliberate­ly overlooked physical mistreatme­nt. The ninestrong committee includes SNP Westminste­r leader Ian Blackford.

In 232 cases, British officials supplied questions or intelligen­ce to allies, and in 198 cases received intelligen­ce obtained from detainees despite knowing of or suspecting mistreatme­nt. There were at least 38 cases in 2002 alone of British officers witnessing or hearing about mistreatme­nt.

The committee rejected agencies’ claims that these amounted to “isolated incidents”.

In the report, testimony provided by Iain Livingston­e, now serving as acting chief constable of Police Scotland, reveals how officers were prevented from boarding a plane on the tarmac at Prestwick to check whether it held detainees.

Mr Livingston­e told the committee in 2017 his officers sought “guidance” from the Americans, “and that guidance was that we can have the individual­s on the aircraft come off and meet you on the tarmac; however, you cannot come on board the aircraft. So we were then presented with... Border Force engaging with the Americans on the tarmac, taking them on their word that there was no one left on board their aircraft.”

The practice known as “extraordin­ary rendition” – used by the US particular­ly in the aftermath of the 9/11 attacks – saw terrorist suspects flown to despotic countries so they could be tortured.

It allowed US officials to state publicly that America did not torture people accused of committing a crime, even though this was being contracted out to an ally with little regard for human rights. The term ‘erroneous rendiiton’ grimly sums up one problem when the rule of law is circumvent­ed.

As the US was flying people about to a network of “black sites” around the world, it needed other allies to be complicit in the practice even if those countries were too squeamish or, relatively speaking, principled to get directly involved.

According to a report by MPS and peers on the intelligen­ce and security committee, the UK was one of those countries.

It described how, following claims Prestwick Airport was being used as a stop-off point for the secret flights, Police Scotland opened an investigat­ion in 2013 into whether any crimes had been committed.

But when the UK Border Force tried to find out who was on board one flight that had landed at Prestwick, a rather odd exchange took place. Iain Livingston­e, now acting chief constable of Police Scotland, told how Border Force officers were given “guidance” by the Americans that they could not board the plane but its occupants were prepared to meet them on the tarmac. The Americans gave their word no-one else was inside.

Despite being “acutely aware of potential allegation­s in the past around extraordin­ary rendition” and wanting to look around the plane for that reason, the officers took the Americans’ word for it.

It is an incident that speaks volumes about the so-called “special relationsh­ip” between the US and UK. We are, very much, the junior partner and US officials are happy to make that crystal clear when they feel the need to.

However, the officers at Prestwick could have directed their questions to agents of our own government. It was “beyond doubt” the UK’S intelligen­ce agencies knew detainees were being mistreated and that “more could have been done” to stop what the US was doing, the committee found. And it was “difficult to comprehend” how senior officials “did not recognise the pattern of mistreatme­nt by the US”.

 ??  ?? 0 A ‘mysterious’ Gulfstream aircraft suspected of being used in the US government’s controvers­ial ‘extraordin­ary rendition’ programme on the tarmac at Prestwick
0 A ‘mysterious’ Gulfstream aircraft suspected of being used in the US government’s controvers­ial ‘extraordin­ary rendition’ programme on the tarmac at Prestwick

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United Kingdom