The Scotsman

If May doesn’t go, she must be removed – or voters will remove Tories

The Prime Minister has failed to make Brexit mean Brexit – and must pay the price, writes Brian Monteith

-

We are being taken for fools by the Prime Minister, but fortunatel­y the public can see through her and are giving her a big collective raspberry. Only Tory party loyalists – who prostrate their sycophancy for us all to see in search of personal ambition, sheer ignorance of the facts or because they are so partisan that party always comes before country – are advertisin­g their willingnes­s to look foolish.

I am a Leaver, I came out for taking back control when still serving in the Scottish Parliament an age ago. There are only two viable positions for our country, or indeed any country: being fully in the European Union or being fully out. Anything else is a self-deceiving construct that in time brings servitude to what the EU wants.

I can therefore respect the arguments of Europhiles who wish us to be involved in, even leading, the European project. The likes of Nick Clegg and Matthew Parris or Peter Mandelson believe in the EU; my only disappoint­ment was that they and the Remain campaign were so unremittin­gly negative, so convinced that scaremonge­ring would save the day, they studiously avoided the case for the long march to a United States of Europe.

Likewise I abhor the narrow nationalis­m that believes being outside the EU is enough; that we can return to warm beer, Union flag bunting and the false certaintie­s of the Fifties and the rest of the world will beat a path to our door.

I believe in the UK developing internatio­nal relations to open more doors than we have ever done before; in using our supreme strengths at soft power (ranked top again last week above France, the US, Germany and the rest) to generate more benign influence in favour of the rule of law, property rights and individual freedom. It’s what the French call our Anglo-saxon view of the world, although the influence of our Celtic civilisati­on makes it more complex and beneficial than they understand or appreciate.

All I have been looking for was for Theresa May to secure the red lines she initially set out – of taking back control of our money, our borders, our laws and our terms of trade. I believed she meant it, for they are red lines that define any independen­t country, even in this interdepen­dent world.

We should not be blackmaile­d into taking quotas of refugees but be free to do so when we think it appropriat­e and treat all potential migrants equally without favour to one country over another, as we have done with EU citizens over everyone else.

We should set our taxes to suit our economic circumstan­ces and ambitions rather than be told what we can and cannot put VAT on.

We should only enter into military alliances where our national interest is protected and not put at risk because of vacillatio­n between Berlin and Paris.

Our judiciary should be respectful of our legal tradition, not subservien­t to political or judicial activism of a different code that overrules our Parliament’s laws.

And our trade should be without the EU’S walls that keep out the poorest, but encourage commerce so that every nation’s boat is lifted.

The Prime Minister promised us that these objectives would be realised but her White Paper is completely at odds with her words. She told us explicitly we would not have “associate membership” with the EU but now says we shall have an “associatio­n agreement” of the type designed for countries entering the

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United Kingdom