Israel’s top court says West Bank Arab village can be demolished
● Bedouin face eviction after judges’ decision condemned by EU
Israel’s Supreme Court has cleared the way for the demolition of a Bedouin village in the West Bank, rejecting a final appeal in a case that has drawn heavy international criticism and become a rallying cry for the Palestinians.
In its decision, the court rejected an appeal to block the demolition of Khanal-ah mar. It said that a stay would expire in a week, and the encampment could then be legally torn down.
The fate of Khan al-ahmar, just east of Jerusalem, has raised grave concerns from the United Nations, the European Union and others. Palestinian leaders have repeatedly gathered at the spot to protest against the demolition.
Israel claims the village, an encampment of corrugated shacks outside the Kfar Adumim settlement, was illegally built and has offered to resettle residents seven miles away. But critics say it is impossible for Palestinians to get building permits and that the demolition is meant to make room for an Israeli settlement.
The three judges hearing the appeal said they were presented with no evidence to warrant overturning the previous verdict and there was no question over the illegality of the construction on the site.
Defence minister Avigdor Lieberman praised the judges for their “brave” ruling in the face of a “hypocritical” campaign directed by the Palestinians, the Israeli left and European countries. “No-one is above the law. No-one can stop us from implementing our sovereignty and responsibility as a state,” he said.
The village is in the 60 percentof the west bank known as Area C, which remains under exclusive Israeli control and is
home to dozens of Israeli settlements. Israel places severe restrictions on Palestinian development there and home demolitions are not unusual.
In rare cases, Israel has also evicted Jewish settlers who have squatted illegally. But settlers generally have a much easier time receiving building permits, and the government often retroactively legalises unauthorised outposts, looks the other way or offers compensation to uprooted settlers.
As part of interim peace deals in the 1990s, the West Bank was carved up into
autonomous and semi-autonomous Palestinian areas, known as Areas A and B, and Area C, which is home to some 400,000 Israeli settlers.
The Palestinians claim all of the West Bank and say that Area C, home to an estimated 150,000 to 200,000 Palestinians, is crucial to the economic development of their future state. Israel says the structures that make up the Khan al-ahmar encampment, which include an Italian-funded school, pose a threat to residents because of their proximity to a highway. But critics have dismissed this claim as a ploy to remove the village’s 180 or so residents to clear the way for new Jewish settlements.
The tribe of previously nomadic Bedouin have lived in the area since migrating from the southern Negev desert after Israel’s creation in 1948. In time, they found themselves nestled between two major Israeli settlements and developers were calling for them to be evacuated. The case has been locked in legal limbo for nearly a decade, with the court’s issuing repeated stays, but yesterday’s ruling appears to remove the final obstacle.
The UN High Commissioner for Human Rights’ office has called on Israel to abandon its plans and said the destruction of private property by an occupying power violates international law. The EU has asked Israel to reconsider the planned demolition. Like many other Bedouin encampments, residents of Khan alahmar live in corrugated shacks or tents, often without electricity or running water.