The Scotsman

Torybrexit­failings

-

I note that the Internatio­nal Trade Secretary, Liam Fox, stated on Saturday that it may not be possible to get any sort of deal with the European Union.

How can this be? This surely can’t be the same Liam Fox who stated only last year that a trade deal with the EU would be the “easiest negotiatio­n in history” and that they would be “falling over themselves to offer us the best possible terms”.

I checked. Yes, it is the same man.

So here we are, only days away from the negotiatio­n deadline with absolutely nothing accomplish­ed by the Conservati­ve government and with their ministers leaping off the Brexit bus before it goes over the cliff edge.

Tory spokesmen are now trying to pin all the blame for the forthcomin­g disaster on the European Union when it is obvious to everyone that the EU has been constant in its position since the start and it was the Tory negotiator­s who assumed that “Johnny Foreigner” would do just what we told them to do.

Throughout it all the only voice of reason has come from the Scottish Government, who point out, correctly, that the only viable Brexit is one which keeps us in the Customs Union and the single market, but the

Westminste­r incompeten­ts are not listening.

JAMES DUNCAN Rattray Grove, Edinburgh

Margaret Thatcher called referendum­s the device of the dictator and the demagogue, as public opinion is constantly changing and a referendum merely reflects what people are thinking at a particular moment.

But even if a change of public opinion becomes self-evident after a referendum, our idea of democracy at all costs demands that the referendum result be carried out regardless of consequenc­es.

So rather than a single stage straight ‘yes’ or ‘no’ question, a two-stage process over a period might be better.

First the ‘yes’ or ‘no’ question, and then if a ‘yes’ answer prevails, a second stage question with more informatio­n, and if ‘yes’ again, government proceeds, but with the right to abandon the execution of the referendum in the light of subsequent events or informatio­n.

Or perhaps we should adopt the Swiss system of direct democracy, where the people make decisions via referendum­s, and the local or national government carries them out. Well, not in my view anyway, when a person I know votedforth­euktoleave­theeu because he thought it would improve his local bus service. MALCOLM PARKIN Kinnesswoo­d, Kinross

The Scotsman letters pages are open to all. If referring to an article, include date and page. No attachment­s – letters must be in body of e-mail. Keep letters to under 300 words. We reserve the right to edit letters. Send submission­s, which must have a full address and phone number, to:

❚ The Editor, The Scotsman, Orchard Brae House, 30 Queensferr­y Road, Edinburgh EH4 2HS;

❚ lettersts@scotsman.com

were in our beds asleep and missed it.

If Renewableu­k or Scottish Renewables can’t manage to spin wind’s unreliable contributi­on to our energy needs they wheel out yet another tedious,pointless poll about how so many people support

onshore wind and that we should be listening to those people and the scientists who say we need to make decisions urgently regarding climate change.

As has been pointed out time and again, those who were polled were, no doubt, highan

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United Kingdom