The Scotsman

Warning from DUP as ministers forced to reveal legal advice

- Paris Gourtsoyan­nis 0 MPS have attacked the ‘cavalier’ approach of the UK environmen­t department to the risk of severe disruption to food supplies and trade in agricultur­al goods under a no-deal Brexit

The government has been forced to lay out its legal position on the proposed withdrawal agreement when Brexit negotiatio­ns have concluded. Facing a defeat in the Commons, ministers allowed a parliament­ary motion to pass unopposed, demanding the publicatio­n of legal advice on Brexit and the mechanism to exit a “backstop” on the Irish border.

The Labour motion called for the publicatio­n of any legal advice in full - including that provided by the Attorney General - on the proposed withdrawal agreement on the terms of the UK’S departure from the EU.

Commons Speaker John Bercow said the motion

was “effective” and “not just an expression of the opinion of the House”, adding that he expected the government’s response would be “swift”.

Cabinet Office Minister David Lidington said the government would make available its position statement to all MPS ahead of the meaningful vote on any deal. He also confirmed that the Attorney General would take questions from MPS in the Commons on the statement.

Shadow Brexit secretary Sir Keir Starmer denied Labour was calling for draft advice, and told MPS: “It’s the final advice, it’s available to every MP and it’s available at the point that the final proposed withdrawal agreement that’s been agreed with the EU is put to this House””

Mr Lidington said: “I want to give a commitment to the opposition and the House: we will make available to all members of the House, following the conclusion of negotiatio­ns and ahead of the meaningful vote, a full, reasoned position statement laying out the government’s both political and also legal position on the proposed withdrawal agreement, and that includes any protocols that might be attached to it.”

In a warning to the government, the DUP backed Labour’s bid to seek legal advice, guaranteei­ng a government defeat.

DUP sources were quoted saying that ministers should consider parliament­ary arithmetic ahead of a final vote on the Brexit withdrawal agreement, including the future of the Irish border.

Conservati­ve former attorney general Dominic Grieve said publishing the legal advice would be a mistake, despite thinking the government appeared to be setting a “quite disgracefu­l timetable” to “bulldoze” MPS into supporting the deal without enough informatio­n. Tory Remainer Anna Soubry expressed her “concern” that she had been told to abstain in the vote, asking: “Who is running this country? This government or [Brexiteer group] the ERG?”

DUP Brexit spokesman Sammy Wilson said the public should know the “full implicatio­ns”, saying: “It should be spelt out to the public, the people of Northern Ireland and the people of the UK should know, is the government binding you to an arrangemen­t which will be impossible to get out of collective­ly or just for the people of Northern Ireland?”

SNP Europe spokesman Peter Grant drew a comparison with the Iraq war to make the case for publishing legal advice on Brexit, adding innocent people could die in a reference to warnings over shortages of medicine.

 ??  ?? 0 Speaker John Bercow said the motion was ‘effective’
0 Speaker John Bercow said the motion was ‘effective’

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United Kingdom