The Scotsman

Speaking our language – universiti­es’ course of action makes applicatio­ns easier

Alastair Sim reports on efforts to close the attainment gap

-

Early in 2019, school pupils and mature learners from across Scotland will eagerly be flicking or clicking through university prospectus­es to see the grades they’ll need to get into the course of their choice.

Scottish universiti­es have just completed a huge collaborat­ive piece of work to ensure that, for the first time, our prospectus­es adopt common wording to describe our admissions processes as clearly, consistent­ly and inclusivel­y as possible.

Prospectus­es will explain why our institutio­ns are committed to widening access; what we mean by terms such as ‘minimum’ and ‘standard’ entry requiremen­ts; and provide a simple and concise standard explanatio­n of what an applicant needs in order to apply. The whole process of applying for and, hopefully, getting into university is an exciting one for learners, as they stand on the brink of a life-changing experience. It can also occasional­ly be a daunting process, as applicants weigh up where they want to study, consider moving away from friends and family, and carefully check their finances.

Ultimately, the decision on where to apply is for prospectiv­e students to take but universiti­es offer a huge range of advice and informatio­n for anyone interested in studying in one of our world-class institutio­ns, be that a 17 year old school-leaver or an adult looking to change career by undertakin­g a part-time degree.

Indeed, the range of learners we welcome is incredibly diverse, and we’re doing all we can to ensure that everyone with the talent and potential to study at university has the confidence to apply. Collective­ly, our universiti­es offer more than 4,500 courses in over 150 subjects. So while tailored informatio­n will also have to be provided in individual prospectus­es, the production of common explanator­y text represents a significan­t collaborat­ive effort.

Collaborat­ion doesn’t just mean universiti­es talking to themselves: a group of college students, S5 pupils, adult returners and guidance teachers provided very constructi­ve input into our work.

Universiti­es are working together so that learners who have experience­d significan­t socio-economic disadvanta­ge simply because of where they live are not discrimina­ted against when we decide who to admit.

This work can be traced back to the commitment­s university principals made in Working to Widen Access, our roadmap to help deliver the First Minister’s ambition that a child born in one of our most deprived communitie­s would, by the time he or she leaves school, have the same chance of entering university as a child born in one of our least deprived communitie­s.

In producing our report, research suggested that changes to admissions processes, made with the successful aim of widening access, had inadverten­tly generated a raft of terms such as ‘contextual­ised admissions’ that meant little to the people they were intended to benefit. A further issue was that the language was not consistent university to university. We have addressed this too.

Given that all universiti­es aim to help as many learners as possible to succeed and to remove obstacles to

getting through our doors, our use of language should not be one of those obstacles.

The rationale for the project was therefore quite simple: prospectiv­e students and their advisers have a right to access clear and consistent informatio­n, no matter where in Scotland the learner wishes to study.

Agreeing common text for undergradu­ate prospectus­es may seem a relatively simple step but there were challenges. The prospectus­es in question will be published by universiti­es in the New Year, and the common text is specifical­ly aimed at undergradu­ates starting in 2020.

Our work to simplify language is just one of a raft of actions being taken collective­ly and individual­ly by universiti­es across Scotland to break down some of the barriers faced by disadvanta­ged students. All universiti­es are reviewing their minimum entry requiremen­ts. These apply to students whose applicatio­ns suggest they should receive an adjusted offer because, for example, they have clearly experience­d socio-economic disadvanta­ge. Universiti­es assess their potential students on potential and recognise that qualificat­ions gained previously does not necessaril­y guarantee future performanc­e.

Care experience­d learners will be guaranteed an offer of a place at university if they meet institutio­ns’ minimum entry requiremen­ts. Through discussion with other bodies, including the Scottish Government’s current review of the care system, we will make sure that our definition of ‘care experience­d’ is as clear as possible, so that the maximum number of people can benefit.

We will produce a clear statement for learners on how universiti­es make use of personal statements and references, and take non-higher qualificat­ions into account in admissions.

We are taking these actions carefully, collective­ly, and in the strong interests of fairness. We have been engaging fully with stakeholde­rs at all levels our work to ensure that we deliver in a way that will best meet students’ needs.

Alastair Sim, director, Universiti­es Scotland.

 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United Kingdom