The Scotsman

Whisky giant loses Indian copyright row

- By STUART MACDONALD

An Indian firm has won a copyright wrangle with the makers of the world’s biggest-selling single malt whisky.

The producers of Glenfiddic­h whisky have failed to block Glenfield being registered as a trademark. The rival’s label features the same green and gold colours.

The makers of Glenfiddic­h whisky have lost a legal battle with an Indian firm who they accused of copying their product.

Indian businessma­n Vivek Anasane, 41, wants to expand his Mumbai-based drinks firm into the UK with the launch of a Scotch called Glenfield. He applied to register the name of the blended whisky as a trademark to protect its brand.

However, William Grant & Sons, who own Glenfiddic­h – the world’s biggest selling single malt whisky – objected to the move. The company’s lawyers said the applicatio­n overlapped with their registered trademark and people could confuse the two products.

As well as having a similar name, Glenfield uses the same green and gold colours on its label and also features a stag.

Glenfiddic­h bosses claimed Glenfield could benefit from this confusion and called for their applicatio­n to be blocked. Now the UK Intellectu­al Property Office (IPO) has found in Glenfield’s favour and said consumers were unlikely to confuse the two whiskies.

In a written ruling, trademark hearing officer Mark Bryant said: “Conceptual­ly, other than the common occurrence of GLEN, meaning ‘a narrow valley, especially in Scotland or Ireland’, the respective marks have no conceptual similarity.

“The common occurrence of the GLEN element is likely to be readily understood by the average consumer as an allusion to Scotland.

“This is likely to be the overriding perception of the consumer and I am of the view that the applicant’s mark will not even bring the opponent’s mark to mind let alone confuse the consumer into believing that the goods sold under the respective marks originate from the same or linked undertakin­g.

“Next I turn to consider the question of misreprese­ntation of the opponent’s label mark.

“The presence of a device of a single stag exhibits difference­s to the applicant’s heraldic device featuring two stags rampant that are unlikely to go unnoticed.

“In respect of the colour combinatio­ns, these provide some similarity and may serve to fleetingly bring the other mark to mind, but the significan­t difference­s, particular­ly in the dominant elements Glenfiddic­h and Glenfield are such that I find the difference­s outweigh the similariti­es and the applicant’s mark will do no more than bring the opponent’s mark fleetingly to mind.” Coralie Vial,

global brand manager for William Grant & Sons, said in evidence the Glenfiddic­h trademark brand had been in existence since 1960 and had been using green and gold colours for many years.

William Grant & Sons have been approached for comment.

 ??  ?? 0 Whisky drinkers are unlikely to confuse Glenfiddic­h and Glenfield, it was ruled
0 Whisky drinkers are unlikely to confuse Glenfiddic­h and Glenfield, it was ruled
 ??  ?? 0 The two whisky bottle labels both feature stags
0 The two whisky bottle labels both feature stags
 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United Kingdom