The Scotsman

Call for legal change so unmarried partners can inherit without a will

● Lawyers say current system can create ill-feeling and cause delay

- By CHRIS MARSHALL cmarshall@scotsman.com

Lawyers have called for a change in the law to allow unmarried people to inherit from a deceased partner who leaves no will.

The Faculty of Advocates said reforms should be made so that cohabitant­s have an automatic entitlemen­t to inherit, allowing them to continue living in the family home.

At present, the surviving partner of couples who live together, rather than marry or enter a civil partnershi­p, has to apply to a court to obtain any financial provision in intestacy, the situation where someone dies without leaving instructio­ns about what should happen to their property.

The Scottish Government is currently carrying out a consultati­on on the Law of Succession, asking whether cohabitant­s should have to continue applying to the courts.

The Faculty said the current system could create ill-feeling between heir and cohabitant, and involve expense, uncertaint­y and delay.

In its response to the consultati­on, it said: “None of this is consistent with a modern efficient and fair law of inheritanc­e in circumstan­ces often of great stress to the survivors of the deceased.

“Succession law is meant to be clear, straightfo­rward and efficient. Requiring applicatio­ns to the courts as a matter of course for cohabitant­s is undesirabl­e for all of these reasons.”

It said cohabitati­on was now a common feature in our society, and there should be an automatic entitlemen­t to inherit, but not to the same extent as a spouse.

It added :“Cohabitati­on should not be equated to marriage or a civil partnershi­p. We do not agree with the proposals that after a certain period of time a cohabitant should have the inheritanc­e rights of a spouse. That would not be in line with general expectatio­ns either of society or cohabiting couples. It would, in effect, create marriage for the purposes of succession or inheritanc­e law.”

The Faculty suggested a oneyear minimum qualifying period for cohabitati­on, and said a cohabitant’s entitlemen­t to inherit should be on condition that the deceased was not married or in a civil partnershi­p at the time of death.

For intestacy more generally, it said it favoured the suggestion of adopting principles similar to those of Washington State in the United States, where the division of property when a spouse dies allows for distributi­on of the wealth generated within a marriage/civil partnershi­p.

Elsewhere in the response, the Faculty said a convicted murderer should be disqualifi­ed from being executor to their victim’s estate, and that step-children should not have the same rights as biological or adopted children to inherit in intestacy.

 ?? PICTURE: GETTY IMAGES ?? 0 Cohabiting partners should have limited succession rights say the Faculty of Advocates
PICTURE: GETTY IMAGES 0 Cohabiting partners should have limited succession rights say the Faculty of Advocates

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United Kingdom