The Scotsman

Inside Arts

Janet Archer moves on after Creative Scotland carnage, writes Brian Ferguson

-

There was no shortage of losers from the crisis which engulfed Scotland’s cultural scene in the first half of 2018. The fallout from Creative Scotland’s handling of £150 million worth of applicatio­ns for funding support was so prolonged and widespread that the victims were many and varied.

A decision to completely strip 20 Scottish arts organisati­ons of their support unsurprisi­ngly threw them into chaos and plunged the quango into a crisis largely of its own making. Some of the affected organisati­ons were successful in securing a reprieve, but only after embarking on hastily organised public campaigns, which dragged politician­s like Nicola Sturgeon and Culture Secretary Fiona Hyslop into the mire. Others, such as dance company Plan B and the environmen­tal arts charity NVA, have since gone to the wall.

The crisis was fast-moving as board members resigned, some funding decisions were overturned and MSPS grilled Creative Scotland chief executive Janet Archer and Ben Thomson, the quango’s interim chair at the time of the funding decisions.

It was not until the summer and the publicatio­n of the damning findings of a Holyrood inquiry into the debacle that Ms Archer, who had earlier told MSPS she was “profoundly sorry” for what had gone on under her watch, finally bowed to the inevitable and resigned. Who would imagined back then that Ms Archer would emerge, this week, as one of the winners from the Creative Scotland carnage, as Edinburgh University’s first-ever director of festivals and events? What must some of the individual­s who lost their jobs, or Creative Scotland’s own staff who were embroiled in last year’s crisis, make of her appointmen­t to a newly created post with a £60,000 salary?

Given her new role involves forging better links with the city’s festivals, it is intriguing to think what her relationsh­ip will be like with the Fringe Society, which was cut adrift, to the consternat­ion of its own chief executive Shona Mccarthy, who could not have been more critical of the “insulting” way it was dealt with.

Creative Scotland has largely retreated from the spotlight since Ms Archer’s departure, while a prolonged internal review of the funding debacle and the organisati­on’s manage - ment structures was carried out. Much of its focus appears to have been on the establishm­ent of the new Screen Scotland agency, which is charged with the delivery of a film studio at some point this year. Its new chair, Robert Wilson, has remained firmly in the shadows, while Ms Archer’s deputy, Iain Munro, has taken temporary charge of the organisati­on.

Nearly a year and a half later, Creative Scotland is still grappling with the fallout. Its organisati­onal review is ongoing and the recruitmen­t of a replacemen­t for Ms Archer is still some months away. A widescale review of its funding regimes is still in the early stages, with the first in a series of consultati­on roadshows only beginning this week.

But, Creative Scotland has never properly explained what went wrong, who was responsibl­e, what lessons it has learned and what measures it has taken to both improve its battered reputation and restore confidence in its funding decisions. Janet Archer’s resignatio­n meant she was never properly held to account for the decisions taken when she was in charge. With little prospect of a replacemen­t being appointed anytime soon, it will be some time before there is any sense of Creative Scotland being able to move on into a new era.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United Kingdom