The Scotsman

Time to regulate short-term lets

New report reveals just one in 477 short-terms lets in Edinburgh have the proper planning permission

-

It started in San Francisco in 2008 after two people in their 20s wanted to travel to a conference but couldn’t afford the trip. So they decided to rent out three air mattresses on the floor of their apartment and serve breakfast. They made a simple website, airbedandb­reakfast. com, and three people agreed to pay $80 each to stay. Brian Chesky and Joe Gebbia suddenly realised they were on to something big and invited a former flatmate, Nathan Blecharczy­k, to help “change the way that people thought about travel”. And thus, Airbnb was born.

They could hardly have imagined just how dramatical­ly this one simple, perfectly reasonable and decent idea would change not just travel but the shape of cities themselves. Airbnb and similar firms have since helped millions of people to visit cities they might not otherwise have been able to see and millions of people make a little bit of extra cash.

However, short-term lets have also been blamed for blighting city centres as serious investors realised more money could be made from such properties than long-term renting. Buy-to-let became buyto-short-term let, driving up both house prices and rents in places like Edinburgh. Some tenement blocks have become dominated by holiday flats owned by absentee landlords, with all the associated problems and loss of community spirit. And an unfortunat­e few have found to their horror that their new “neighbours” consist of wild stag parties every weekend.

Now a new report reveals only one in 477 short-term lets in Edinburgh has proper planning permission, with Green MSP Andy Wightman, who helped lead the study, condemning what he called a “staggering pattern of unlawful activity”.

The growth of short-term lets has produced benefits and problems. So it seems clear the best course of action is to try to keep the good and get rid of the bad.

Having a flexible source of accommodat­ion is good for Edinburgh. It means the city does not need to build quite as many more hotels for tourists when life eventually returns to normal. And it means local people can get away in August while making some money by renting out their home to festivalgo­ers. But clearly – and this is not something The Scotsman advocates lightly – greater regulation, perhaps in the form of a licensing scheme, is required to maintain a reasonable limit on numbers and curb the worst excesses.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United Kingdom