It’s time to ditch the status quo and go for a different approach to social care

Social care has frequently been overlooked and undervalued but we now have a chance to be a world leader, says Lucy Mulvagh

Socialc are should bea means to an end, to help people live as independently as possible, participate in – and contribute to – Scottish society. Care homes are an important type of social care, as is the support that thousands of people get in their own homes. This can be to wash and eat, get to work or school, or do countless other things that make for a good life (and many of us take for granted), like going to the shops or for a walk in the park.

One of the consequences of Covid-19 has been greater pub - lic attention on social care. However, problems had been identified with the current system well before the pandemic, and there was widespread agreement that improvements were ur gently needed. Because, despite its vital importance, social care was frequently overlooked and undervalued.

This is one reason why my organisation, the Health and Social Care Alliance Scotland (the ALLIANCE), welcomes and supports the independent review of adult social care led by Derek Feeley. The review has heard from people, communities and organisations with knowledge and experience of adult social care around Scotland, and is due to make its recommendations for improvements by January 2021.

Scotland’ s approach to social care is called S elf- directed Sup - port (SDS), which guarantees people the right to exercise choice and control over their support. Recent research by The ALLIANCE and Self Directed Support Scotland demonstrates the value and benefit thatSDS plays in the lives of people and their families. In ‘My Support My Choice’, we heard about the experiences of over 600 people, and most said thatSDS improved their social care.

One person described SDS as, “the a la carte of the care system” and explained that, “with SDS I have control. I can choose what option I want, within the rules, of course. I find this is much more liberating, to have the ability to decide for yourself is liberating. So, it makes a big difference .” However, not everyone we heard from shared positive experiences, and there are recurrent problems with how SDS works – or doesn’t – for some. For example, several people said they do not get to exercise proper choice and control over their services, and some said they cannot get support that meets their needs, rights and preferences, causing distress and deterioration in their health and wellbeing. We’ve therefore made a number of recommendations about how to address people’ s concerns, build on good practice, and increase the effectiveness and reach of quality SDS.

SDS could be the cornerstone of a world leading, human rights based model of social care. We could use human rights to create a social care system that is fairer, sustainable, transparent and accountable; that delivers acceptable and timely services to everyone; and that values, listens to and empowers service users, care workers and unpaid carers alike.

Human rights aren’t just lofty, theoretical aspirations; they can be used in a practical way to help realise the true purpose and value of social care and develop a system that is firmly cemented in Scottish culture. Interrupted by Covid-19, the Scottish Government’s reform of the adult social care programme had started to advance this agenda.

With the prospect of evershrinking resources and a postpandemic recession, it is not realistic to expect good quality, equitable social care for all by continuing with the status quo. It’s time for a different approach.

Read there search report ,‘ My Support My Choice: People’ s Experiences of Self-directed Support and Social Care in Scotland’ at https://bit.ly/3j9scnf

Lucy Mulvagh, Director of Policy and Communications, Health and Social Care Alliance Scotland