Pub complaints need to be taken seriously
It is important that the government remains flexible in its approach and willing to ignore cries of ‘U-turn’
Nicola Sturgeon’s generally cautious approach to dealing with the Covid pandemic has been borne out by the seriousness of a virus that has caused or contributed to the deaths of more than 10,000 people.
So the Scottish Government’s plan to allow pubs and restaurants in Scotland to begin serving customers outside from 26 April – two weeks after this was permitted in England – is entirely in keeping with the First Minister’s overall strategy.
However, one fairly obvious consequence is that people will “jump the border” – as the Scottish Hospitality Group pointed out – and travel to England to celebrate its newfound freedom. A similar problem also affects self-catering holiday lets, with those in Scotland still closed. Missing out on the first wave of the pent-up demand among many people to simply have some fun will be a further blow to the hospitality sector.
The First Minister has spoken about how she will be driven by “data, not dates” in making decisions over the lockdown and this is usually interpreted to mean that targets for reopening could be delayed if there is a rise in the number of coronavirus cases. But it should also mean it is possible to move dates forward or allow a greater relaxation of the restrictions than previously planned.
The Scottish Licensed Trade Association has now warned that up to two-thirds of pubs and bars will not be able to reopen on 26 April because they will not make enough money to justify doing so. Colin Wilkinson, managing director of the SLTA, went so far as to say that the planned restrictions were so onerous that “really, we’re not being allowed to open on April 26”.
So if the intention is to allow significant economic activity to take place from that date, the Scottish Government should perhaps reconsider in light of the feedback from industry. Weighing the risk of infection against the risk to the economy is an almost impossible task, but it is important that the government remains flexible in its approach and willing to ignore opposition cries of “U-turn” if circumstances –whether that be the infection rate or information about the effect of regulations – change.
And if there is a reason for Scotland delaying its opening and operating under different rules, businesses need to be told. Above all, businesses need clarity, of which there currently appears to be little.